Tom Ricketts Discusses the Importance of the Wrigley Restoration Project and Cubs Finances

Mike Ozanian spoke with Cubs Chairman Tom Ricketts while the team was in New York for the YES Network’s Forbes SportsMoney. Rickets talked about the importance the Wrigley Field Restoration project will have on the team’s finances. And what a restored Wrigley Field could add to the team’s baseball budget.

Tom Ricketts realized a couple of years ago the way the team was being built would not translate into long-term success. Ricketts pointed out that with a good farm system, along with the financial flexibility the team will have moving forward, should allow the Cubs to have a lot of success in the years to come.

Lede: In 2009 amid an earth shaking financial crisis, the Ricketts family bought the Chicago Cubs from the Tribune Broadcasting Company ushering in a new era of family control of the franchise for the first time in almost 30 years. It was also a new era for family control for the Ricketts. Joe Ricketts founded T.D. Ameritrade and built the small, private investment firm, into a publicly held banking behemoth. With the fortune in tow, the family bought the Cubs and appointed Noe Ricketts’ son, Tom as Chairman and the rest of his siblings as members of the board. Tom Ricketts and the team he’s assembled have a long-term plan to create a Championship team. But first they have to maximize their short-term profits while wading through the trouble water of media and fan criticism, Chicago politics and the recreation of one of the most beloved Cathedrals of Baseball, the iconic Wrigley Field.

Mike Ozanian: How important is the renovation of Wrigley Field, and the nearby area of Wrigley Field, to get the Cubs to where you want to take them on the field as a Championship caliber team?

Tom Ricketts: It is really important for a couple of reasons. When you talk about what you can do as an owner to help the club win, doing everything you can to generate extra revenues. Because those revenues you bring in dollars you pay your expenses and the balance of your money goes over to the baseball team to get better. It is very important that we do more for the ballpark to raise those revenues and that will be an important part of our financial strength in the future.

MO: What do you think that this total renovation is going to cost?

TR: There are kind of two components. The park itself is north of $350 million, probably closer to $375 million and half of that is just steel, concrete, electrical, plumbing, the things that we need to do to save a 100-year old ballpark for the next 50 years. The other half will be for amenities and doing things for fans that … where we’ve fallen short, where other stadiums offer more and we’ll catch up with what we do for people coming to the game. The other half of the equation is $150, potentially $200, for outside of the park and that’s to develop the plaza and the hotel. So it’s a pretty big economic undertaking.

MO: How much in additional revenue do you think the renovated ballpark can supply the Cubs?

TR: You are talking $30-40 million. And if you look at baseball, the way baseball teams do their finances, you basically pay all of your fixed expenses. Pay all of your staff and salaries and everything else that you have to pay every year. Cover all of your cost of maintenance upkeep and all of that stuff and everything else goes to baseball. So to the extent we have $30 or $40 million of incremental revenue that can come out of this project that goes to baseball.

MO: One of the things that you’ve been hammered on, at, in the press by some reporters is that what you’ve spent on player payroll has gone down a little bit the last few years. But if you look at next year, 2015 there are only two teams with lower guaranteed contracts for all of their player roster, Pittsburgh and Miami. With the potential renovation and you also have a couple of TV deals that are up for renewal over the next several years, you are actually in a great position to build the team from the ground up.

TR: What we realized just a few years ago was that the way we were going about trying to win on the field wasn’t going to work for the long-term. We were spending a very high percentage of our total baseball budget on Major League payroll and not spending as much bringing the right players in. What it did for us is, while there were some good seasons in the previous decade, we didn’t really have a lot to work with when we purchased the team, so we knew we had to rebuild the baseball organization. With respect to the finances, we are going to have a lot of flexibility moving forward. When you think about a system, which his now ranked second or third by most of the major third party sources in baseball, a strong system and financial flexibility on top of it could lead us to create great teams.

MO: Baseball America, in listing prospects, has the Cubs as the only National League team with two players in the top 10, so that flexibility would seem a very valuable …

TR: … And it’s something you understand well that maybe not every fan understands that is really critical. You have to have that core of players that are under control for those first six years that they are in the Major Leagues. You have to have enough of those guys that you can have the resources to add a free agent or add someone from the outside. If you don’t have that kind of internally generated core it’s very, very difficult to put a consistent winner on the field.

MO: As someone who had been a lifelong, diehard Cubs fan, how important was the fact the Cubs haven’t won a World Series since 1908 in your decision to buy the team.

TR: It’s a big part of it. The fact is that the Cubs quest for a World Series is the greatest mission in all of sports and to be even a little part of that, when we deliver that World Series title to Cubs fans, will be incredible.

Follow ChicagoCubsOnline on Twitter: @TheCCO and @TheCCO_Minors

Quote of the Day

"And if I have my choice between a pennant and a triple crown, I'll take the pennant every time." - Carl Yastrzemski
Share on Fancred
  • Pingback: Tom Ricketts Discusses the Importance of the Wrigley Restoration Project and Cubs Finances - Cubs Chronicles

  • GaryLeeT

    Thanks for transcript Neil, but I am still going to need that garbage can to hurl in. How convenient for TR to always need some future event to transpire, before the team can get better. Are we supposed to believe that the Cubs current lack of competitiveness was totally out of his hands? What a load of crap.

    • http://chicagocubsonline.com/ Neil

      You’re more than welcome.

  • Bryan

    How come that no-one in the FO wants to talk about the field product, and effort (or lack thereof) being produced at the major league level? How many times do we need to read an interview about Wrigley Field, rooftops, revenues, etc? Just ridiculous already.

  • cc002600

    That great core he talks about ? Yea, except for Bryant, none of them are doing squat or are injured. Awesome, Tom.

  • Tony_H

    From the Forbes article. Expect the Cubs to try to do the same thing the Rangers did, by getting a signing bonus well before 2019 for their TV rights.

    “Instead, think of Jon Daniels and the Texas Rangers. Daniels became the general manager of the Rangers in 2005 and soon after rebuilt the team by discarded expensive, older players (Mark Teixeira, Adrian Gonzalez, Chris Young) for younger players (Neftali Feliz, Alvis Andrus, Akinori Otsuka) and the Rangers invested heavily in their farm system.

    The Rangers were bad from 2005 through 2008 and and had one of the lowest payrolls in the majors. But in 2010 the team signed a new television deal withFox Sports Southwest worth $3 billion over 20 years. The deal does not begin until 2015, but the team received a upfront signing bonus from Fox in 2012.

    Instead, think of Jon Daniels and the Texas Rangers. Daniels became the general manager of the Rangers in 2005 and soon after rebuilt the team by discarded expensive, older players (Mark Teixeira, Adrian Gonzalez, Chris Young) for younger players (Neftali Feliz, Alvis Andrus, Akinori Otsuka) and the Rangers invested heavily in their farm system.

    The Ranges were bad from 2005 through 2008 and and had one of the lowest payrolls in the majors. But in 2010 the team signed a new television deal withFox Sports Southwest worth $3 billion over 20 years. The deal does not begin until 2015, but the team received a upfront signing bonus from Fox in 2012.”

    • cubtex

      I might have missed the news here in Texas since it is such a big state. How many WS have the Rangers won since 2005?

      • Tony_H

        So all your talk of just getting to the playoffs and anything goes can happen is just talk?

        • cubtex

          Of course not. I don’t think you need to tank 4 years of futility to “try” and get a team that makes the playoffs this way. Look at the last decade. 3 times. They never tanked on purpose.

    • GaryLeeT

      Cub fans would be drowning in Kool-Aid if they could field a team as good as the Rangers worst team during that era.

  • Pingback: Wrigley Field News | Chicago Cubs » Blog Archive » Tom Ricketts and Crane Kenney Discuss Finances and Wrigley Restoration

  • BillyFinT

    Tom: “What we realized just a few years ago, [..] we didn’t really have a lot to work with when we purchased the team, so we knew we had to rebuild the baseball organization… A strong system and financial flexibility on top of it could lead us to create great teams.

    “And it’s something you understand well that maybe not every fan understands that is really critical. You have to have that core of players that are under control for those first six years that they are in the Major Leagues.”

    Mr. Ricketts, I understand those. I also understand that you are now complaining about the players hired before you purchased this ballclub, whether they were in the Farm or in Wrigley. I also understand that you purchased a part of the bankrupted Tribune Co. as part of the deal.

    I also understand that you threatened Mesa City to move the Chicago Cubs club away, and you finally got your almost-free ballpark paid by citizens, the tax payers.

    I also understand that you’ve been unwilling to move away from a relic of failed business operation in Wrigley Field. I also understand that you are unwilling to pay and build a brand new ballpark.

    I understand that you’ve tried. You tried very hard to work with all business partners. You tried politics. You work with the Machine in Chicago City. You wanted to work with the rooftop owners.

    What I don’t understand is that when will you stop trying? You might eventually operate an organization like the Marlins and Pirates. I don’t have a crystal ball. I can’t see your Future. Right now, you are not respectable. There are a lot of richer people than you, and many of them are more respectable than you.

    So now, Mr. Ricketts, the question is, what are you trying to accomplish with this ballclub? That might help a little bit, you know. If it’s winning, well, start doing that. Maybe that’ll bring you some respect. You’ll end up in the History textbook.

  • PleaseStopLosing

    As Tom spends no money to put a winning team on the field, I will continue to spend no money that will flow to his pocket. Keeping the stands empty is the only way that our voices can be heard.

    • GaryLeeT

      I noticed the stands are often full of the visiting team fans. The resale prices are so low that fans of other teams can finally afford to check out Wrigley, and see their team win.