Updating Samardzija, Tanaka, the Posting System and Other Cubs News and Notes

After a rather busy weekend, the Jeff Samardzija rumors quieted down on Monday. Jed Hoyer reiterated the team’s desire to sign Samardzija to a contract extension, and he explained the team is staying in contact with Samardzija and his agents.

At least six teams (Nationals, Orioles, Pirates, Rockies, Diamondbacks and Blue Jays) have contacted the Cubs about Samardzija with the Blue Jays and Diamondbacks appearing to be the most interested. Toronto and Arizona tried to trade for Samardzija last July and were unsuccessful.

If the Cubs cannot work out an extension with Samardzija by the Winter Meetings, they are expected to shop him at the annual gathering. The Cubs have no intention of giving him away and it will likely cost a team three-four top young players to acquire Samardzija, according to Bruce Levine.

Jeff Samardzija is under team control for two more seasons and would give the acquiring team a cost-effective top of the rotation starter. Samardzija figures to be paid $5-$6 million in his second year of arbitration eligibility, which should fit easily into a contending team’s payroll. But if the Cubs decide to move him, will the front office find a team willing to pay the price to acquire Samardzija?

Masahiro Tanaka and the Posting System

According to a report from Jon Heyman, “top Japanese officials are scheduled to fly to New York this week to try to finalize a new posting system.” Major League Baseball and Nippon Professional Baseball were expected to have the new posting system in place by Nov. 1, but the deal was pulled off the table after a lengthy delay. And Heyman reported “there is no guarantee a deal will be struck” between the two leagues.

Citing a report in the Japan Times as his source, Heyman added that representatives from the 12 NPB teams met last Monday about the situation and Japanese officials are leaning toward a deal similar to the previous posting agreement in which interested teams placed blind bids and the highest bid was awarded exclusive rights to negotiate a contract with the player. The previous window was 30 days after the team was informed they placed the winning bid.

Ben Badler posted an update on the negotiations between MLB and NPB on Baseball America. Badler reported “speculation from Japan is that an agreement could be reached by the end of the month.” Badler explained the new posting system was accepted and expected to be approved by both leagues before MLB took the proposal off the table during the GM Meetings in Orlando. MLB cited a delay in response from the NPB as the reason.

The new system would have allowed the team with the highest bid to “pay the average of the top two bids to the Japanese club as the posting fee.” And the new agreement would “likely allow MLB to count a greater percentage of what a team pays to acquire a Japanese player against the luxury tax, since only the posting fee itself is not subject to the tax.”

Once the two leagues hammer out the details, the Rakuten Eagles are expected to post Masahiro Tanaka.

The Yankees are considered a lock to outbid the other interested teams for the right to negotiate a deal with Masahiro Tanaka. The Cubs are on record saying they will be involved in the process, once he is posted, and the Dodgers, Angels and Giants are also expected to place a bid.

News, Notes and Rumors

The Cubs have been connected to free agent outfielder Nate McLouth this winter. And while the Cubs might be interested in signing McLouth as a stopgap for next season, the Yankees are also interested in McLouth according to Ken Rosenthal. The Yankees remain in contact with McLouth and view him as an inexpensive option for their outfield if they do not have enough money this off-season for Carlos Beltran or Shin-Soo Choo.

And speaking of the Yankees … they are eyeing every free agent on the market, or just about, according to Jon Heyman.

The Marlins are showing interest in Phil Hughes and Dioner Navarro. The Cubs are one of the teams thought to be interested in Hughes while they have showed little public interest in re-signing Navarro. Peter Gammons reported Monday afternoon that Navarro was close to signing with a team … but Gammons did not specify which one while ruling out the Red Sox. Nick Cafardo posted what one talent evaluator recently had to say about Navarro. “He’s great on a one-year or shorter-term deal. Problems are his weight, his work ethic, and flexibility behind the plate, so it gets a little scary on a multiyear deal. He can flat-out hit, so if you have the catch/throw guy, he’s not a bad complement to that.

Kris Bryant talked about the year in which he played in five leagues and wore five different uniforms with Ron Kantowski of the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

A report on Chicago Side Sports explained why the Cubs should sign Jarrod Saltalamacchia.

Follow ChicagoCubsOnline on Twitter: @TheCCO and @TheCCO_Minors

Quote of the Day

"You can be a kid for as long as you want when you play baseball." - Cal Ripken Jr.
Share on Fancred
  • STLCubsFan

    If the Cubs do end up trading Shark, I would love to see a package along the lines of:

    Diamondbacks- Archie Bradley (near MLB ready), Jake Barrett (power reliever tearing up the minors now with a 1.21 ERA, 0.98 WHIP, 10.2 K/9, and 2.08 BB/9 in 52 innings in 2013), and Stryker Trahan (Ranked #7 catching prospect on MLB.com and could provide catching depth in a barren Cubs system).

    Blue Jays- Aaron Sanchez (top RHP prospect with plus fastball and curve), Marcus Stroman (another projected power bullpen arm near MLB ready), and A.J. Jimenez (near MLB ready catcher that sported a .287/.332/.406
    2013 slash line as well as a career 43% CS% on defense).

    I’m not sure if this is too high of an asking price, but I would not mind letting Shark go for a package of these prospects.

    • daverj

      Yes, it’s probably too high an asking price, but I would guess that your proposals are close to the Cubs asking price. The Cubs will likely hold Shark for now unless a team overpays in prospects. I would expect both the Jays and DBacks to pass on those deals.

      • STLCubsFan

        Yeah I overshot my return predictions based on how Theo conducted his previous trades/proposals. Although I don’t see either team jumping at the opportunity, I would sure love another Garza-esque return.

    • Frustrated

      I would throw in Brett Jackson and Vitters (Both Tim Wilkin busts)

    • 07GreyDigger

      I think MLB Trade Rumors had a opinion yesterday that as free agent pitcher prices continue to rise, some teams may look to Samardzija and the asking price since it makes more fiscal sense.

    • mutantbeast

      Id love the Snakes proposal-there not going to trade Bradley, hes there version of our big 4. Maybe Skaggs instead of Bradley and they might be interested, but we are not getting Bradley. Even Towers isnt that dumb.

  • daverj

    It wouldn’t surprise me if the Dodgers made a run at Shark. I would think Epstein would want Zach Lee, Urias, Pederson and another of the Dodgers Top 10 prospects.

    • CubbyDenCritic

      wasn’t some of the names in the Dempster trade rumors?

  • CubbyDenCritic

    Nate McLouth……Jim Hendry was trying to trade for that guy five years ago…….Nate was a cheap free agent a year ago and the Cubs by passed him.

  • CubbyDenCritic

    Once Garza, Arroyo and other pitchers sign large contracts, you will see Sharks asking price start to rise.

  • K_Gripp

    I believe the time frame to contend is being moved back to 2016. If my suspicion is correct then the Cubs will trade Samardzija. If the Cubs plan on being competitive in 2014 or 2015 they will hang on to him and find a way to hammer out an extension.

    I’d imagine they would be looking for a package similar to what they got for Garza but with a pitcher that is closer to the majors. There is no way the Cubs get Bradley in a deal for Samardzija. Bradley is 8 years younger and there is a good chance that he could be in the majors this year putting up better numbers than the Shark.

    • Eugene Debs

      I can guarantee they are not thinking contention in 2014.

  • Pingback: Cubs Could Wait to Deal Samardzija Until Later in the Off-Season and Other News and Notes - Chicago Cubs Online