Is Angel Guzman on the Block?

Vote 0 Votes

Depending on the source, the Cubs are looking to add a right-handed relief pitcher, a fourth outfielder or a starting pitcher ... or maybe all three. Jim Hendry would like to make changes to his roster before Spring Training, that much is known.

The CCO's three-part series on the projections for the 2010 season will resume but with pitchers and catchers reporting to Fitch Park in just over a month, February 17, let's check in on the mill.

The Cubs like Ben Sheets, but can't afford him. Could the Cubs really be shopping Angel Guzman? News on Felipe Lopez and Heath Bell, plus another minor league signing was announced on Tuesday. Here's the latest ...

Chatting with Bruce Levine

The always-informative Bruce Levine held his weekly chat Tuesday afternoon on ESPN Chicago from Mesa, Arizona. Mr. Levine is in the Phoenix area for the owners' meeting with all 30 GMs in attendance. Here are the highlights:

  • The Cubs have discussed trading Sean Marshall, Tom Gorzelanny, Mike Fontenot and Angel Guzman in possible deals that would net them a fourth outfielder or a veteran relief pitcher.
  • According to Levine, "Guzman will most likely be moved to bring back either and outfielder or another setup man." The Cubs like Angel Guzman but "they're unsure of the stability of his arm for the future."
  • The media will receive a progress report from Ted Lilly during the convention.
  • Lilly is still targeting to begin throwing next month with a late April return.
  • Carlos Zambrano is the only one that can fix Carlos Zambrano ... not Greg Maddux. Levine pointed out Zambrano always reports to camp in good shape but seems to "gain weight during the season." Levine thinks he should "stay away from the second and third spread in the clubhouse everyday."
  • Levine agreed with a comment that suggested the Cubs should extend Derrek Lee's contract.
  • Due to money restraints, Jim Hendry will "have to be a bottom feeder" this winter. The new owners have basically "frozen the payroll."
  • Ryan Theriot will be moved to second base eventually, "hopefully" with Starlin Castro at shortstop. Levine "would not be shocked" if Lou Piniella tries to move Theriot to second during Spring Training if Starlin Castro "has a good start."
  • The Cubs are "pretty well convinced" Jeff Samardzija is "not a pen guy for now." Samardzija will get an opportunity to earn a spot in the rotation.
  • Jim Hendry has talked to a "few teams about trades" for a right-handed reliever ... including Toronto for Jason Frasor.
  • Money is an issue for the Cubs ... and trades will have to include similar contracts.
  • The Cubs like Jonny Gomes. Gomes' agent is looking for a good deal and the Cubs do not have the money.
  • The Rockies "probably" want a bullpen arm for Ryan Spilborghs.
  • The Cubs are monitoring Alfonso Soriano and are hoping he will "bounce back" next season without the nagging leg injuries that has plagued his first three years with the Cubs.
  • Aramis Ramirez is working hard this winter. Ramirez's agent, Paul Kinzer, recently spoke with Levine and indicated his client is working "on his conditioning and strengthening the muscles around the area where the shoulder was dislocated."
  • Aramis Ramirez is one of three Cubs that will not be at the Convention.
  • Koyie Hill is the backup to Geovany Soto.
  • Levine would be cautious on spending money on Ben Sheets ... Levine feels Jon Garland or John Smoltz could be a better fit.
  • The Cubs have no interest in Felipe Lopez according to Bruce Levine's source.
  • The Cubs will have three second basemen on the roster "when Starlin Castro becomes the starting shortstop."

Ben Sheets

The former Brewers' ace keeps popping up with the Cubs. Bruce Levine has indicated for weeks that the Cubs have interest in Ben Sheets. Sheets is looking for a lot of money ($10 to $12 million) but Ken Rosenthal predicted last week Sheets would end up with the Cubs for less than his asking price.

Paul Sullivan reported on Monday night that the Cubs are planning on making a run at Sheets. The Cubs are interested in Sheets and will watch him workout but they might not be able to afford him.

Bruce Levine said on Tuesday that the Cubs chances of signing Sheets are around 10% ... unless he takes a "cousins discount." Sheets is from Louisiana.

Levine thinks the Cubs could only sign Sheets for around $1 million, plus incentives. The Cubs should be concerned over Sheets injury history. Like Kerry Wood and Mark Prior, Ben Sheets is a high-risk, high-reward pitcher.

The Cubs have approximately $3 to $5 million left on the payroll to add a fourth outfielder, a bullpen arm and a starting pitcher according to Bruce Levine. Sheets is wanting more than that despite the fact he did not pitch last year.

A report from Cubs.com indicated Sheets' asking price "does not appear to fit" into the Cubs budget ... if he is demanding what reports have suggested.

As Bruce Miles pointed out, the Cubs still need to see him throw "and if Sheets and agent Casey Close want a high-priced multiyear deal, it won't be with the Cubs."

Jim Bowden reported during his show on XM Radio (MLB Live) with Joe Castellano on Tuesday night that he has heard the Cubs would really like to add Ben Sheets ... just not at his "astronomical" asking price.

Heath Bell

Bruce Miles reported on Tuesday that there "doesn't seem to be much to those Heath Bell rumors, at least at this point." Bell is arbitration eligible and is in line to have a huge payday. Miles questioned if the Cubs want to mess with Carlos Marmol again this spring.

The Cubs' Payroll Commitments

Baseball Prospectus recently added Jeff Euston (Cot's Baseball Contracts) to their team. Kevin Goldstein used the great resource and broke down the Cubs payroll ... here is the link. It is more than worth the read.

Hot Stove U ... The Cubs' Contractual Cul-de-sac

Minor League Signing

Non-roster invitations to big league camp should be announced in the next 10 days. The Cubs signed Bryan LaHair and appear to have re-signed Brad Snyder ... both are expected to compete for a spot on the Cubs bench this spring.

Baseball America finally caught up (a little) from the Holidays on Tuesday.

The Cubs signed right-handed relief pitcher Jeff Kennard.

Jeff Kennard was 3-1 in 40 games for Louisville (Reds Triple A) last season with a 2.83 ERA and a 1.22 WHIP. Kennard finished 14 games with two saves. Kennard is 36-26 in nine minor league seasons with a 3.44 ERA and a 1.38 WHIP. In 338 career games, he has made only one start.

Jeff Kennard's Page from Baseball Reference

The Cubs Caravan kicks off on Wednesday. The two-day event is the lead in to the Cubs Convention, which begins on Friday.

Well, that's the latest ... and I am sticking to it!

Follow the CCO on Twitter ...

If you don't have an account on the CCO ... sign-up for one to share your thoughts and interact with the rest of the Faithful.

  • MarioC

    I teach Math to High school kids. It's an extremely rewarding job, mostly because I'm pretty good at it, and my students feel comfortable "screwing up" in front of me...I have the Cubs to thank for this. My love of the Cubs has taught me INFINITE PATIENCE.

    I don't see how anybody can say "there is no grace period" with a new owner. I think short-sighted fans and analysts find it easy to play the "what-have-you-done-for-me-lately?" game. And don't get me wrong--I'm not a rose-colored-glasses guy...I see genuine problems with this team next year. And maybe it's because I don't live in Chicago, and therefore don't get it on the news/radio etc...but lets all face it: We've been fans for 15, 20, 30, 50 years...how is it that THIS YEAR we draw the line? What is different about THIS YEAR, that we lose it if they don't win (which I'm not putting my $$ on)?

    And bear in mind...that's not a rhetorical question...each of us loves the Cubs for our own individual reasons, and I'd like to know from those whose patience has run out...what is it about THIS YEAR that says Ricketts has no grace period?

  • jerljr

    Kingdomusa,

    We'll see how much you like that bullpen when in the first week of the season the opposition scores in double digits and they have about three blown saves.

    That bullpen you listed is aweful. And I dont think adding one veteran will help. Unless maybe a good closer then it look a little better

  • cc002600

    It's beyond me how Sheets and his agent think he will get 10-12M per year. The guy has a history of arm problems, hasn't pitched since 2008, and is coming off major elbow surgery.

    are you kidding me ?

    As I have said before, if any team gives him more than $1 to 2M base with incentives, they are completely stupid.

    The chances that this guy will be the same pitcher he was before the surgery, given his history of injuries, are SLIM AND NONE.

  • Gramps

    Cloycub and/or Tony for general manager!

    Yes!!

    GO CUBS!

  • Ripken Boy

    If I hear any more about Ryan Spilbourghs I am gonna puke. He can't even put up decent numbes in Coors field and we are gonna trade Guzman for him? He is awful. This could be another Jim Hendry mistake.

  • daverj

    No worries ... the Rockies aren't dumb enough to deal Spilbourghs for Guzman so it won't happen.

  • Ripken Boy

    Ricketts=McCaskeys

    It's all about making $$$ and not winning. You can't run a baseball team like a Fortune 500 business. Family ownership is not good. The Tribune spent big bucks and any GM worth anything would of assembled a great team for $140 million dollars. Instead, we have a average big league club and below average minor league system and no clear plan. The Ricketts family needs to gut the front office and start over and rebuild the team with young players and let them develop.

  • cloycub13



    Regarding a few assessments that Ricketts is to blame for not spending money. I whole heartedly cannot disagree enough! He inherited this payroll mess. He did not create it. He inherited the mess of arguably the worst Salary V. Production ratio in the history of the game. He also inherited an aging and Historic ballpark. People are complaining about what he is spending on, Guess What? He has to do it eventually!

    Let's for fun, say that they wait to improve the field. Let's say that they give Jimbo free reign to bring in Chapman, Sheets, O-Hud, Byrd etc etc. Spend Spend Spend, more money on contracts and players. Are you not then saying that he should continue the practices that have allowed for this mess to occur in the first place?

    The grace period is over I agree, but it is not for Tom Ricketts et al. It is for Jim Hendry! The 101 years are not Ricketts' fault either. That is the result of a century of bad management decisions, culminating in panicky moves, leading to further bad management, and failure.

    It is my humble opinion that Tom Ricketts is doing everything he can to STOP bad management, STOP bad contracts, and STOP relying on free agents to make this team whole. He is forcing Hendry to be a real GM. And thus forcing our Minors to improve, and opening up a window for winning that is not 1-2 years like the one we just saw slam shut in our face, but for years to come.

    He could have been a Jeffery Loria type and slash payroll. He did not, in fact he slightly increased it to accomodate for the crap that he was handed as far as payroll. That Crap has a shelf life of 1-5 years (Thanks Soriano). Opening up for Bigger and Better additions than the likes of Joel Piniero and the Mike Cameron's of the world.

    And guess what else? Improvements to Wrigley all along the way. Give the guy some time to show what they are really made of. These moves are just the opening salvo in a long and hopefully fruitful ownership regime. But the additions of Jaramillo, Maddux, Sandberg etc are steps in the right direction.

    I'll step off of my soap box now.

  • cubs1967

    ur response is exactly why it's been 101 yrs and no championship..........cubs fans have for far too long accepted mediocrity becuz wrigley is a fun place to watch a game........pathetic.........!!

    ricketts have almost 2 yrs to understand the payroll.......if he did not like it; don't buy the team.

    101 yrs.......there is no grace period for any owner ever till the cubs are champs.....there is virtually NO ONE alive today who has seen the cubs as champs.......think about it.

    i nor did anyone else say sign players to 4-5-7 yr deals this year..but 2 yr deals for tejada or garland or hudson......the team is stuck w/ contracts for the next 2 yrs before payroll will be much lower....the goal is a WS.......nothing else........there is no give the ricketts 5 yrs to build their plan BS........the sooner the ricketts get that, the better. or they can enjoy empty seats in august of this year instead of sept like last year.

    these bad contracts have resulted in 3 winning seasons..........

    only sori's will be bad beyond 2011.

    (big Z wins 15 this year......he's tradeable based on what lackey got this year........so is dempster. lee, lilly, aram all could be gone and fukunuts is tradeable next year w/ 1 yr left(and eat 5M or so).......

    cubs fans don't need new johns; we need a WS!........now.

    to date the ricketts have raised tix prices; not upped the payroll, will bring in more ad dollars w. LF billboards;(and not spend on team); possibly screw the city of mesa and be the first team in 20 yrs to move back to florida, which will result in fans finding 4 parks instead of 12 within an 1 hour drive of spring training not to mention the uber rich naples hotels compared to mesa area hotels. in other words; he's not done a damn thing for the fans to date.

    make hendry out to be the scapegoat all u want; but carol slezak; who i think is one of these worst reporters ever in the chicago market could figure things out; then cloycub U should too!

    when 99.9% of living humans have not witnessed a WS championship for your team; then there is no way in hell a grace period..............

    here's hopong ricketts gets this when he attends the convention; it ain't gonna be the lovefest he thinks it will be.



    so cloycub........

  • SuzyS

    Cubs 1967...my question to you is this...

    would you rather win one and be done for the next 50 years or wait a couple of years and be a strong contender for the WS for 10 or 20 years?

    To win the WS...you need 2 Aces, great defense...and strong...strong offense.

    No team can build that in one year.

    and JH screwed up OR lost his gambles on

    Soriano/Fukodome/Z.

    Reality is...we're not close...so the other option is to build it right.

    So while I understand your frustration...

    (I'm right there with you.) I recognize reality.

  • diehardcubfan

    I will have to disagree with you somewhat here. 101 years and counting!!.....Enough said. Sooner or later you have to take a shot! This team as it is made up now has only about one to two more years to get the the top. It has too many contract and age issues to be effective beyond 2012.

    It has pretty much hit its make it or break it point. The Cubs can make it back to the playoffs this year and with a few more intelligent moves could actually win it all. Let us face it there are only a couple of really strong teams in the NL so anything is possible.

    That being said, if the Cubs did win it you would be under the assumption that Soriano and others had bounce back years allowing the farm system to continue to mature and buying time to continue to scout, sign, trade and develop talent at the lower levels.

  • SuzyS

    Ok...assume the bounceback occurs...there's still too many holes and not enough $$$ to fill them.

    Larry Rothschild even said we need a couple of guys to really step up...

    Do you see that in our current rotation?

  • diehardcubfan

    I am like you in that I am still suspect on the rotation but it is very similar to the 2008 group minus Marquis and a half season of Harden.

    If somehow Sheets becomes affordable then there is no issue assuming that Wells does not suffer from the sophomore jinx.

    I am also still hopeful (and I know a lot of fans do not agree with me) that the Carlos Silva the Cubs got is the one from the Minnesota days.

    The Cubs first four starters (Big Z, Dempster, Lilly and Wells) are good enough to contend but I agree with you that sooner or later JH is going to have to get a bonafide ACE because we sure do not have it now if we want to win it all.

    We can only be eternal optimist here.

  • Tony

    Stand up on the box as long as you like. You said it correct, when you said

    "Are you not then saying that he should continue the practices that have allowed for this mess to occur in the first place?"

    Some of the advice on here, would put the imaginery team they are building, in the same boat as the team JH has assembled, full of aging, overpaid veterans.

    The answer is not to go spend more dollars, it's to get value for the money you have, to fill short term needs. There will be plenty of players, that want to play the game they love, willing to take less $$$'s to be able to continue playing. The players that hold out for unrealistic contracts will be home sitting on their already over bloated bank accounts.

    Don't spend what little payroll dollars are available by hoping for health, rebound year, etc. We have enough of that on our roster already. Fill in with younger players we already have. Do we really need another aging player.

    OF - Soriano, Byrd Fukudome, Fuld, Snyder. Baker is also to get time in the OF.

    3B - Ramirez, Baker

    1B - Lee, Hoffpauir

    Middle Infielders

    Theriot, Blanco, Baker, Fontenot (Castro when ready)

    C - Soto, Hill, Castillo

    SP - Zambrano, Dempster, Lilly, Wells, Gorzellany - Silva, Marshall, Samardzija

    Bullpen - Marmol, Grabow, Guzman, Marshall, Gray, Atkins, Berg, Caridad, Mateo, Parisi, Parker, Patton, Stevens

    I am all for Blanco at SS, with Theriot getting most of the time at 2b. I would have Baker play 4-5 games a week (1-3B, RF when Leftys pitch, 2B 1-2 games, fill in for Soriano to keep his legs fresh. Fontenot has little use.

    This list doesn't even account for all of the guys from AA or AAA, who are mentioned as possibly arriving 2010. Mid-March, when we know more about some of the status of all these players, there will still be plenty of players available to fill the holes at that time. There will still be aging veterans looking for contracts then too.

  • SuzyS

    Tony, No dispute with your post...but everyone seems to miss Gaub in the pen.

    If he's not traded...it could be a breakout year for him....He was awesome last year with AA and AAA with an era under 2.00....and he's another lefty.

  • diehardcubfan

    Gaub maybe the reason the Cubs can shop Marshall or Gorzelany. I agree he has been a guy that has been overlooked but but when the trade for DeRosa was made everyone commented from what I saw that the Cubs did well on the prospects they picked up so maybe Gaub could give a shot in the arm and the pressure will not be that much given he will be in the backend of the bullpen and only have to pitch in the middle innings.

  • Gramps

    I also like Gaub. Let's hope he does well in Spring Training and forces his way onto the opening roster! I like the idea of guys busting their tails in spring to force management to put them on the roster. Too many times these jobs are just handed to players.

  • SuzyS

    Cloycub...I like that soapbox...keep it handy. I agree with you.

    Ricketts has to walk a tightrope...he has to keep the fans coming for Revenue strams to continue...but the whole team needs to be reconstructed in the next few years.

    The most important decision looming...

    is the right guy...gm...to do te reconstructing...I hope he gets it right.

  • JimBo

    Why are people enamored with Theriot. I conceed that at SS he has good hands and an accurate arm, but his range & arm strength are mediocre. He is major part of why the Cubs D is not strong up the middle. If we moved him to 2B his D would not be any better than Baker and Baker has much more pop at the plate. IMHO ... The Cubs would be better off starting Blanco at SS (because he is the real deal defensively), Baker at 2B and trading Theriot while he is worth something.

  • SuzyS

    Jimbo, Theriot has the job because of his bat...and he is relatively cheap....

    not because of his defense.

    He's also extremely likeable and is a workhorse...with the intangible quality

    of "HEART".

    He will be better at 2nd then ss.

    Riot will be with us until he gets too expensive...and/or the arrivals of both

    Castro and Hak Lee.

    I'm a huge Blanco fan...but I still don't know if he is an everyday player.

    Indications are he has finally found a groove with his bat...but we'll see.

  • joel

    Definitely they should take a good hard look at Miggy, Ive been saying that now for months.

    He would be a great #2/#5 hitter and allow Theriot to switch to the 2B as the Cubs clearly have planned. That would immediately give us great depth with Baker(younger DeRosa) to play all positions and spell Soriano/ARam/Lee/Fuku and Fontenot to go back to the role he was so great at in 2008.

    Ryan Theriot

    Miguel Tejada

    Derrek Lee

    Aramis Ramirez

    Marlon Byrd

    Alfonso Soriano

    Geovany Soto

    Kosuke Fukudome

    OR

    Kosuke Fukudome

    Ryan Theriot

    Derrek Lee

    Aramis Ramirez

    Miguel Tejada

    Alfonso Soriano

    Marlon Byrd

    Geovany Soto

    Now those are some scary lineups (assuming Soto/Soriano return to form)

    but that obviously wont happen.

  • rswartz

    Gary couldn't agree with you more on Tejada. Sign him to a one year deal and place him at short. Worst comes to worst he has a terrible year and we can then throw Starlin in for some experience. The other benefit is we keep him from the Cards who seem to be eager to place him at third now that Derosa has signed in SF.

    Does anybody know what the current asking price is for Garland and Smoltz?

  • GaryLeeT

    Ricketts is being penny wise and pound foolish. The Cubs could get Sheets for about 5 mil plus incentives, Tejada for about 5-7 mil (1 or 2 years while he holds Castro's place) and Johnson for 2 mil. If the Cubs don't make moves like these, then they will win about 75 games, and have a hard time filling Wrigley against anybody but the Cards or Brewers. Ricketts will lose about 10 times the extra 7 or 8 mil he needs to spend on payroll.

  • PaulS

    Gary I agree with you. I think there could be some real bargains coming up and if the Cubs cannot take advantage of them it would be a shame. Like you mention, 1 or 2 year with a reasonable salary and these players would still be movable if you fell out of the race. Why give up anything of value in a trade when you have these options. How about Dye out in RF, it seems like his suitors are shrinking.

    We are built for win now for the next two years, so pickup some of the veterans if they are going to be cheap.

  • cubs1967

    101 yr and counting, there is NO grace period........ricketts family......of all people carol slezak/chicago suntimes today has an article on the new owners and the fact there is not being any monies spent this year to improve the team; yet the 4.82 avg tix price increase/14.48M revenye increase is all going to the park; as i've been screaming about---new washrooms; great; win a world series, better!

  • kingdomusa

    Guzman is a winner....Why do we need a 2b & corner of. We need 1 starting pitcher. Go with castro @ ss & theriot @ 2b.It nice to have Angel, Caridad, Grabow, Samardzija or Gorzelanny, Berg in our pen. We have good relief. Hendry

    needs to leave the Cubs. He is a poor

    GM & was the laughing stock of the Winter

    meetings. He has trafed tons of chemistry in the clubhouse away the past 2 yrs. Yes, team chemistry & the idiotic pickup of Bradley ruined the Cubs in 2009. He loves to agitate Marmol by bringing up closer names because of his total dislike of Marmol going to the World Baseball Classic over spring training. Oh, lets not forget his "love affair" with Kevin Gregg. Marmol deserved the closers role as we watched Gregg give up a league leading 13 HR's in relief which set a NL record before

    we finally made a change. Wonder what Hendry thinks of Marmol's 11 for 11 saves after he took over the job. Carlos shoved it right down Hendry's throat. Beleive me, there is a reason Hendry won't sing in the 7th inning Cub fans, I think everyone knows why????

    Boooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!

    I hope we get Ryno in 2011 & maybe let Maddux become the pitching coach & Ricketts finds a "REAL" baseball GM

  • SuzyS

    I like Guzman...JH better maximize the return if he trades him...but I don't see the Cubs getting the same time of upside Guzman has when healthy...given his history. I bet JH wishes he had a

    healthy Ascanio back.

    Does anyone think Caridad could fill that role?

    If Guzman is indeed traded...it just adds

    to the long list of hyped prospects that

    somehow fall short.

  • diehardcubfan

    You are so right that when Guzman is healthy he has nasty stuff and that JH needs to get something decent and that fills a hole in return. The problem being what is really a big hole in the mind of JH and then what is a hole in reality.

    I did not get to see Caridad throw on TV or live but looking at his stat line during his brief call up it is impressive. He held opponents to a .221 average in 14 games and only walked 3 in 19 innings so those are good numbers.

    Caridad is probably the only reason that JH would consider trading Guzman at this point.

  • Ronald

    SuzyS most of Angel Guzman injuries was not when he was still a starter.

  • SuzyS

    Ronald, I'm very aware of Angel Guzman's history.

    I don't understand your point...or what you are saying.

    I am not happy about him being traded but

    could understand the reasoning...BUT Hendry better get back someone worthwhile.

    When healthy, Guzman has nasty stuff.

  • matt

    i wanna how how come hendry isnt looking to sign felipe lopez for 2nd he can fill our lo hitter role and 2nd base he isnt that expensive we shouldnt worry about pitchin our pitchin is one of our strenths we need hitters on base guys we should be lookin for a 2nd base and lo hitter and maybe 4th outfielder

  • Ronald

    Which pitching staff are you watching, pitching will probably be one of our weakness this year.

  • Matt Haggard

    This is a rumor that I'll bite at.

    I'd absolutely place Guzman on the block if it means we could fill some holes with him.

    No way he replicates last season or even pitches through the season. His arm just doesn't have it in him.

    And no way does Sheets end up with that kind of money. He may sit out 2010 asking for that.

    He'll be in Chicago come April.

blog comments powered by Disqus








CCO Twitter Updates




Shop WrigleyvilleSports.com Today!

Twitter Sports

Cubs on Twitter

Displaying tweets tagged with #Cubs

via twitter sports net


Recent Comments


Chicago Cubs Online - Featured On The Web Here

Chicago Cubs Online - one of Chicago's best blogs
Chicago Cubs Online - on Chicago Sun Times Chicago Cubs Online - on Sports Illustrated

ChicagoCubsOnline on YouTube