Weekend Update ... New Rumors to Fill the Same Holes in the Cubs Roster

Vote 0 Votes

Jim Hendry still has work to do this winter ... and will turn his attention to smaller additions to round out his roster for Twenty-Ten. The Cubs have several holes, a weak bench and a projected everyday lineup that should produce, as long as several key players have 'bounce back' years.

As predicted, the Cubs are "banking on bounce back years" from several players as pointed out by a report on Cubs.com. But Hendry is looking at a couple of players to add to the mix.

Here's the latest from the mill that includes an addition ... former Cub and Southsider, Jon Garland plus notes from Marlon Byrd on Talkin' Baseball.

Marlon Byrd Reaction

Bruce Levine and Jonathan Hood began their weekly talk show by discussing the signing of Marlon Byrd. While Bruce Levine liked the signing, Keith Law of ESPN did not.

Law pointed out that Byrd is "a nice fourth outfielder who could play everyday for a non-contender but he doesn't handle centerfield well enough to play it every day on a team with aspirations of playoff contentions and doesn't hit well enough to play every day in an outfield corner." (Click here for Keith Law's view of the Byrd signing).

Levine thinks the fans will be happier with Marlon Byrd than Milton Bradley. Levine joked about the discount the Cubs received on Byrd compared to Bradley (Byrd and Bradley share the same agents, the Levinson Brothers, and they got both Bradley and Byrd a third year from the Cubs).

Marlon Byrd is an underrated centerfielder according to Levine and he pointed out that Byrd's career has improved each of the three years under Rudy Jaramillo. Levine is not sure where Byrd will hit. He has heard anywhere from fifth to seventh and that will depend on which Alfonso Soriano shows up.

Byrd should be able to help the Cubs' offense but Aramis Ramirez is the big key to the Cubs in Twenty-Ten. Ramirez must stay healthy and produce. Levine pointed out that Ramirez can opt out of his contract following 2010 ... he has a small window in November that he can decide to become a free agent and void the final two years of his contract.

Levine talked about the other options for the Cubs in centerfield ... outside of Byrd. He called the Jacoby Ellsbury rumors "ridiculous" and pointed out the Cubs were in talks with Scott Podsednik and Rick Ankiel.

The Cubs weighed the options on all three outfielders and felt Byrd was the best of the three. Podsednik is below average defensively but above average getting on base. Ankiel has the biggest upside of the three. He is younger and better defensively but the Cubs are concerned about him mentally.

Levine pointed out Ankiel struggled at the plate last year. Coupled with the fact he could not rebound from the problems he had pitching, the Cubs are concerned if Ankiel will be able to mentally comeback from struggling again.

The question about Jim Hendry backloading Byrd's contract was brought up later in the show. Levine said the Cubs needed the flexibility for the upcoming season (Byrd will earn $3 million in 2010, $5.5 in 2011 and $6.5 in 2012). Hendry still needs $7 to $8 million to work on his bench and bullpen ... plus the arbitration eligible players. According to Levine, both Ryan Theriot and Carlos Marmol will receive significant raises in 2010 ... from around $450,000 to $500,000 in 2009 for each to near $3 million each in their first year of arbitration.

Marlon Byrd on Talkin' Baseball

The Cubs' new centerfielder joined Bruce Levine and Jonathan Hood on Saturday morning. Levine began the interview by asking how he chose the Cubs.

Byrd said the Cubs are right there with the Yankees as one of the most storied organizations in the game ... plus the fact he has a chance to win with the Cubs and make it to the post-season.

Byrd said another reason he signed with the Cubs was because of Rudy Jaramillo. Byrd called Jaramillo the best in the game and credited Jaramillo with getting his career back on track. Byrd explained he learned something every day from Jaramillo in the three years they spent together.

Marlon Byrd knows three of his new teammates personally. Alfonso Soriano, from their days in D.C., Geovany Soto from their PCL days and Derrek Lee from playing against him when Lee was with the Marlins. He explained he knows other players on the Cubs just not the same way as the other three ... he is looking forward to getting to know all of his teammates.

Levine asked about Jaramillo's five-step program. Byrd said Jaramillo makes it very easy and simplifies hitting. Jaramillo stresses rhythm, timing, staying square, seeing the ball and transferring in the box.

Byrd thinks he is equipped to handle the added pressure that comes with playing for the Cubs. He thinks it will be similar and not too different than in Philadelphia. Byrd added that he's gotten used to dealing with the media over the years.

Byrd's relationship with Milton Bradley was brought up. Levine liked the fact that Byrd stuck up for Bradley in his talk with the Chicago media on Thursday ... and pointed out it showed what kind of character Byrd has for doing so.

Byrd explained that he has a great off the field relationship with Bradley. Their kids play together, their wives are good friends but he knows about the other side of Milton. The two spoke after Byrd agreed to terms on Thursday and Bradley told him to do what he could not do in Chicago.

Marlon Byrd credited getting the opportunity to play every day last year as the reason for his career year. The original plan was for Byrd to be the Rangers' fourth outfielder when the season began but Josh Hamilton's injury forced him into the lineup on a daily basis. Byrd said once they put him in the four-hole he was able to get comfortable, get into a routine and found a rhythm.

Byrd thinks the transition to day baseball will be pretty easy for him. He said he's an early riser in the off-season and likes the fact he will be able to be home at night ... and put his kids to bed and wake up with them in the morning.

Marlon Byrd was very humble and sounded up beat throughout his time on ESPN 1000. Byrd finished the interview by saying he can't wait to get to Mesa and get started.

(Link to the Podcast of Byrd's Interview on ESPN Chicago)

The Bench

Like most, Bruce Levine is concerned with the Cubs bench. He feels there is no balance in their every day lineup and they must add balance to their roster with the bench. He pointed out the importance of building a roster from the back forward, like Kenny Williams does, and due to the fact it took a long time to move Bradley, Hendry is two to three weeks behind.

The Cubs would like to add a left-handed bat to the bench and he feels they will fill the need via a trade ... and not a free agent signing.

Ryan Spilborghs is still on the Cubs radar. They have talked to the Rockies about him but he would not fit their need for a lefty on the bench. Levine did not mention any other names.

The Pitching Staff

There should be more concern over Ted Lilly's recover from shoulder surgery than there has been according to Bruce Levine. Levine continues to hear they are expecting Lilly back in mid to late April but it is unknown at this point. A shoulder is a tricky thing and the Cubs will not know until Lilly begins throwing when he will return.

Levine indicated, once again, the Cubs have talked to the agent for Jose Contreras and continue to discuss bringing in Ben Sheets. The other name the Cubs have discussed is Jon Garland.

Garland is a free agent and is not getting a lot of "sniffs" this winter according to Levine. He thinks Garland still has a lot to offer and could fill a need for the Cubs.

Garland posted an 11-13 record in 2009 (between the D'Backs and Dodgers) with a 4.01 ERA and a 1.40 WHIP. Garland has totaled at least 200 innings in five of the last six seasons (2008 was the only year since 2004 that Garland has not totaled 200 innings ... he pitched 196 2/3 for the Angels while posting a 14-8 record in 32 starts). Garland has made at least 30 starts in nine of his ten big league seasons (made his debut in 2000 and started 13 games for the Sox).

Jon Garland's Page from Baseball Reference

Another name Levine threw out was John Smoltz. Levine did not mention the Cubs specifically being interested but said he thinks Smoltz would be a good fit while they wait for Ted Lilly .

Smoltz could make the five or six starts Lilly will miss at the beginning of the season ... and would not cost that much to sign.

Bruce Levine mentioned the Cubs interest in Jason Frasor again on Saturday morning ... and he feels that is one of the players the Cubs could add.

David Patton will be in the bullpen mix this spring according to Levine. Patton's slider has graded out as a 60 and they were very impressed with him last year ... despite the fact Lou Piniella did not want to use him when rules forced Patton to remain on the roster.

Jim Hendry is looking to "pad the bullpen over the next two weeks" likely with trades instead of free agent signings according to Levine.

Jeff Samardzija, Tom Gorzelanny and Sean Marshall will compete for the fifth spot in the rotation. Levine feels Marshall's time has come and he's earned a chance for a spot in the rotation. He pointed out that Marshall has done everything the Cubs have asked him and if they aren't willing to give him a chance, then he should have one with another organization.

Jim Hendry

Bruce Levine mentioned all of the negativity surrounding Jim Hendry right now. Levine said the criticism is justified but pointed out the fact that many people have forgotten about the back-to-back division championships.

The bar has been raised on the North Side over the last six to seven years when an 83-win season has been labeled as a failure according to Levine and Hood.

Carlos Zambrano

Jonathan Hood asked Bruce Levine about all of the Carlos Zambrano rumors. Levine mentioned the reports from Joel Sherman in the New York Post and said there is no doubt that the Cubs have had conversations about Zambrano. But how many feel Zambrano is worth $18 million a year right now?

Zambrano is coming off a down year and if he's somewhere between a 16-game winner and a nine-game winner that would put him at 12 wins ... how many would pay that much for a 12-game winner?

Big Z has a lot of wear and tear on his arm and will be playing at 29 years old ... Levine joked about 29 as being the age that Z is listed at. Right now Zambrano is not worth what the Cubs are paying.

Levine thinks Zambrano will bounce back and win around 15 games.

The Last Word ... While Ernie Banks might say the "Cubs can Win in Twenty-Ten" the theme for Lou Piniella's crew for the upcoming season will clearly be "Bounce Back in Twenty-Ten" as forecasted by the CCO earlier in the winter.

A report from Cubs.com and recent interviews with Jim Hendry focused on players like Alfonso Soriano, Geovany Soto, Mike Fontenot and Carlos Zambrano having bounce back seasons ... as well as keeping the rest of the roster, namely Aramis Ramirez and Derrek Lee healthy and in the lineup on a daily basis.

The Cubs are still looking for ways to improve before the season begins but right now, as Bruce Levine pointed out, what you see is what you get with the Cubs roster.

Follow the CCO on Twitter ...

If you don't have an account on the CCO ... sign-up for one to share your thoughts and interact with the rest of the Faithful.

Well, that's the latest ... and I am sticking to it!

  • SuzyS

    DieHard...it's why I lusted after Ey Jr so much...and some of the others like Aaron's Moreland/Davis from Texas.

    While I knew they would be longshots for JH to acquire...it would have at least been nice to hear rumors about them...to show JH had a thinking cap on.

    But noooooooooooooooo....We get Byrd,

    Silva, and Grabow instead.

    (BS & Grabow).

  • daverj

    SuzyS,

    I really think that the reason there were no EY Jr, Moreland or Davis rumors was that the players were not available for anything within the realm of reasonable ... not that JH isn't interested in those players. The Rockies and Ranges have a good understand of their young talent. While there was a bit of talk in October that the Rangers would consider dealing Davis, the package the Rangers were seeking must have been astronomical or there would have been plenty of teams interested and many rumors.

  • SuzyS

    Insomnia hits me...David F.

    You may be right...BUT...within your post lie the seeds of the Cubs current downfall:

    "The Rockies and Rangers have a good understanding of their young talent."

    Why don't the Cubs have that same understanding?...ie Casey Mcgehee...

    Snyder over Colvin etc. (Re Snyder...

    it may be just me...but I do view it as a mistake.)

    And yes, for the record, I've lost ALL confidence in Hendry as a decision maker.

    As Lou always says:

    "I really don't know what to do, I really don't."

  • daverj

    I agree with your statement about the Cubs lacking an understanding of young talent ... or least lacking the ability to develop it.

  • Reggie

    Even the mention of the word Silva makes me want to vomit. A $12M dollar a season man who will eventually be pushed into the darkest depths of the bullpen adding nothing to the team, downright criminal.

  • diehardcubfan

    You put JH and thinking cap on in the same sentence. Please, do not punish yourself so hard.

  • Chris

    I don't know about anyone else, but this "hope for bounce back year" stuff makes me sick to my stomach. I'd really like to us have a contingency or be able to do something in event that Soto tanks for another year. Really what I'm reading i.e. Soto is: "We really hope he does well, if not, there isn't much we can do or have planned to do."
    Same thing with Soriano, Fuku, Fontenot, Z, etc.. I know we are bound to most of these guys contractually, but it just seems like lack of planning to me.

  • diehardcubfan

    I know what you mean that we are all hoping for a lot. These big long term contracts are killing us right now.

    We can only hope that guys like Soriano, Soto, Big Z and others at least have average seasons or it will be a long summer.

  • D

    I never liked Patton... Garland is an ok option I wouldn't mind, and also I still want Felipe Lopez! Spilbourghs is weak, I don't see whats wrong with Reed Johnson for one more year atleast that way we don't have to give up anything in return.

  • John_CC

    How's the weather over there? I talked to my mother (in SW Michigan) she said they got a good lake effect snow job this weekend. I miss those storms.

    No thoughts on Garland? He is the definition of an "inning eater", eh Rip? Except he isn't terrible. 30 starts every year and 200 innings six seasons in a row. I think that he could be a quality number 4. I don't know, if he'd come cheap for a year or two, he's better than a lot of the options so far.

  • SuzyS

    jc 3-6-3 I know you addressed rip but

    where are you? I hate winter as I get older...and we are in the middle of an artic freeze...nothing to miss.

    Garland, I would think, is out of our price range...considering the type of

    Garbage we are hearing rumors about...

    (Contreras). If a cheap contract could be worked out...fine...he's worth the risk...But if Sheets is healthy, and reasonable...I'd still take a flyer on him over Garland...Sheets could be dominating yet. (IMHO)

  • John_CC

    Suzy, I've been in Montana for the past 10 years. I know, it probably sounds weird to hear me say I miss those blizzards living here...we get plenty of frigid weather but not the same kind of snow dumps as the lake effects where I grew up... at least not in the valley where I live.

  • SuzyS

    JC 3-6-3 Thank God...I thought you meant you missed the cold...I completely understand the difference in snowfalls...

    New Hampshire storms(where I lived for

    years) are completely different from the Midwest. I hear Montana is pretty nice...someday I hope to get there...but when it is warm.

  • diehardcubfan

    I so much agree with you that if Ben Sheets is healthy and not going to cost that much (I am thinking incentive laden contract like many others) that he is the best option of all of them.

    He can be the difference maker but he is also a big risk but I think if the money is available and he passes a physical he is worth the risk and JH should at least take a shot.

    I just don't think JH is really working hard to address our leadoff/2B situation but I could be wrong.

    I just do not like any of our current options at leadoff. This team will be slower than molasses in winter if this does not get fixed and in a lot of close one run ball games we all know this could make a big difference.

  • Neil
  • Whatupbr

    I don't think there's much you can do to add BOTH speed and power in a LH bat for the bench. Let's face it - if this team is going to win Ramirez, Lee, Soriano, Soto and Byrd will have to provide the power. If all of them hit (no guarantees there but if they don't, you can kiss '10 goodbye anyway), there will be more than enough pop. I think you've got to add speed and defense to this team - starting in the outfield. I shudder when I think about Soriano in left and Byrd in center. At the very least, we need some deer to run out there in the late innings. I'd like to see somebody who can steal a base too.

    Neil - You obviously didn't like the Taveras suggestion I made yesterday. What about this? Do you think KC would swap Josh Anderson straight-up for Tyler Colvin?

  • Neil

    Josh Anderson might be the type of player the Cubs need ... good suggestion.

    All three outfield spots, lefty and young.

    Coming off the year he had I would think Colvin might be too much. The Royals are trying to keep as many 0-3 players as possible, so that will limit what the Cubs can offer.

    I am higher on Colvin than most are due to what I heard Sandberg say about him. I'm not sure what the Cubs could offer but I like the name you threw out.

    http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/a/anderjo03.shtml#trans

  • Whatupbr

    Perhaps Brandon Guyer would be a better match...

  • Neil

    I think that Guyer would be the type of prospect it would take ... another good call.

  • Whatupbr

    Alternatively, I wouldn't mind bringing Pie back. He'll turn 25 this month showed some signs last year that he may actually grow into the beast we hoped he would. Would Hoffpauir or Spencer and Darwin Barney or Tony Thomas get it done? Is that too much?

  • Aaron

    I know I might come off a jerk by saying this, but wanting Jason Frasor?!? Based the hell on what?!?!

    Here's his ERA in his 6 seasons:

    4.08 ERA, 1.463 WHIP

    3.25 ERA, 1.272 WHIP

    4.32 ERA, 1.280 WHIP

    4.58 ERA, 1.228 WHIP

    4.18 ERA, 1.437 WHIP

    2.50 ERA, 1.023 WHIP

    Yup, just what we need, another player coming off a career year. How'd that work with...

    -Lee extension

    -Dempster extension (though he wasn't that bad last year)

    -Soriano signing

    -soon to be Grabow extension (he'll be a 4+ERA pitcher with a 1.400+WHIP)

    -Bradley signing

    -soon to be Byrd signing (no possible way he even comes close to 20 hr, 89 RBI again)

    -Miles signing

    Need I go on?!? Fact is, going after this type of player is what doomed Hendry from the moment he became GM. Hendry is a loser, and his moves show that fact. Why doesn't he go after consistent performers?

    I'll wait for Hendry's response...LOL

  • Neil

    Aaron, of the names I've seen/heard Jason Frasor could be a solution depending on what they would have to give up.

    Yes he's coming off a career year but it would not be a long term deal. He's coming off a positive year in the AL East and as you pointed out, he's shown improvement, minus his WHIP, the past three years.

    I also like his BABIP in the 8th inning and he could give Piniella another option ... just not in the 9th.

    http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/split.cgi?n1=frasoja01&year=2009&t=p

    And the numbers say he keeps the ball down.

    If the Cubs were offering him a multi-year deal I woul more than question but giving up a Mike Fontenot-type player would be okay from the numbers I've seen.

  • SuzyS

    Aaron, you got me. I didn't research him enough...and just saw what he did last year...The good news is I don't get paid $4 mill per year to make those decisions.

    Given the team is what it is right now...

    and it is likely JH will pick up a bench

    bat...and another RH reliever...whom would you target?

    Not including Snyder...that I'd like to see...but as Rip said...JH is unlikely

    to sign.

    btw...What are your thoughts on Mota...the AAA Rule 5 arm the Cubs picked up from the Nats...not a lot of info on him.

  • Neil

    Suzy...here's a link to the info I posted on Mota

    http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2009/12/cubswinter2009_7.php#more

    He appears to have a very live arm, but is young and very raw.

    The Nationals picked him for the Cubs from the White Sox organization.

  • SuzyS

    Neil...thanks for the info on Mota and Frasor....Wells is a real "feel good story"...hopefully he can stay on track...but we'll see.

    So far, no real surprises with JH...he's running true to form.

    It would be nice to see a WOW move...but it doesn't appear to be in the cards this year.

  • Neil

    Suzy, here is Frasor's page from Baseball Reference ... I pointed out a little of his info on Friday.

    http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/f/frasoja01.shtml

  • SuzyS

    Some thoughts:

    Garland would make sense if they got him cheap...then if Lilly comes back ok...they could trade Garland for Karchner...oops... time warp.

    From Byrd's perspective...it was a great signing....Rudy reinvigorated his career,

    and who best to prolong it then Rudy?

    I like the GUY already in comparison to Milton...Now we'll have to see about

    the player.

    As far as the Cubs psychological concerns

    re players...I'm not surprised it's at the forefront of a player's analysis in

    Hendry's mind just now.

    Given the money invested in players it wouldn't surprise me to eventually see

    a staff shrink on retainer at some point.

    A lot of baseball is mental as well as physical...confidence is so important...

    it makes sense that a sports psychologist

    eventually become part of every team.

    Fraser would be a nice pickup for the pen.

    And all things being equal...of the names mentioned...Sheets is my preference.

    LH Bats for the bench??? I'll leave that for you guys to propose...this team lacks both power and speed...is there a bench player out there that can give us both in a left handed sort of way?

  • Neil

    Suzy, here's a name for you ... Ryan Church

    http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/c/churcry01.shtml

    He is a free agent and would not add speed but definitely a bat that would fill a need and would not be a defensive liability.

    Hendry was rumored to be interested in Church years ago when he was with the Expos ... then the Nationals.

  • BUBrave

    What a great interview with Marlon Byrd. He's already head and shoulders above Milton. At least if Byrd goes down in flames he'll give off the appearance that he cares and is trying to fix it.

    Do I like the signing... not a lot.

    Do I like the player... yes.

  • joe d

    I like the Jon Garland idea. Hopefully he wouldn't cost too much and would be a much nicer 4 starter than Silva. Stick Silva in the 'pen and hope for the best.

    Why do Hendry and the like keep including Fontenot in the needing to have a "bounce back year" category? Bounce back to what, the 2 or 3 nice months he had in 2008? His AAA stats? I don't know if pitchers figured him out or not (Brenly couldn't really place the issue), or if he just lost confidence. Maybe he got a little pull happy after his "lil Babe Ruth" surge in power. He's like Theriot and should target the opposite field until pitchers make mistakes in his wheel house, not the other way around.

  • slamdog sadowski

    I'm not sure whats Keith Law's gig is, but there were rumors that Law was the reason Wilken left Toronto.

  • Tom

    “Like most, Bruce Levine feels there is no balance in their every day lineup and they must add balance to their roster with the bench.”

    “…the Cubs are concerned if Ankiel will be able to mentally comeback from struggling again.”

    Jaramillo + Ankiel = lefty bat to slot in at 5, 6, or 7 to help balance out the lineup

    Obviously the Cubs weren’t all that concerned about the mental state of Uncle Milty last off season. Why wise up now? I think Ankiel would have been a more productive, more athletic, cheaper, short term solution for CF.

    Why the back-loaded three year deal for Byrd? What happens if Brett Jackson is ready to go in 2012? He would be your CF, and as Keith Law pointed out, Byrd doesn’t hit well enough to play the corner OF spots. That’s an expensive $6.5 million 4th OF!

  • Neil

    With Kosuke's contract running out after 2011, Byrd could move to right if Brett Jackson is ready.

  • Jim C (Tinley Park, IL)

    Insomnia again. Watching a pretty good movie called The Bank Job.

  • ripsnorter

    Jim,

    Let me guess: JHendry is robbing a bank so he can sign a free agent like Milton Bradley or Jacque Jones. AM I right??

  • Jim C (Tinley Park, IL)

    I saw that movie and it was bad, real bad.

blog comments powered by Disqus








CCO Twitter Updates




Shop WrigleyvilleSports.com Today!

Twitter Sports

Cubs on Twitter

Displaying tweets tagged with #Cubs

via twitter sports net


Recent Comments


Chicago Cubs Online - Featured On The Web Here

Chicago Cubs Online - one of Chicago's best blogs
Chicago Cubs Online - on Chicago Sun Times Chicago Cubs Online - on Sports Illustrated

ChicagoCubsOnline on YouTube