Weekend Update ... Castillo, Halladay and Other Cubs Rumors

Vote 0 Votes

The Chicago Cubs made a little noise last week with the two-year, $7.5 million deal for John Grabow and send Aaron Heilman to Arizona for a pair of prospects. Then Friday afternoon, the Cubs added five players to their major league roster ... three expected and two, well a little surprising. John Gaub, Welington Castillo and Blake Parker along with Rafael Dolis and James Adduci were protected from the upcoming Rule 5 Draft with both Gaub and Parker expected to be a part of the Cubs pen at some point in 2010. The Cubs 40-man roster stands at 38 players.

But what else does Jim Hendry have up his sleeve? Luis Castillo? Roy Halladay? Here is the latest from the mill on the Sunday before Thanksgiving ...

Roy Halladay

By now it is well known the Cubs are one of the teams Toronto contacted about Roy Halladay. Bruce Levine reported the Cubs chances of landing Halladay, arguably the best pitcher in the AL, as not likely.

The Cubs and Blue Jays talked about several players three and a half weeks ago according to Levine ... including Milton Bradley. The Cubs discussed Vernon Wells and Lyle Overbay as well as Halladay with Toronto.

Levine explained on Saturday morning (during Talkin' Baseball on ESPN 1000) the Cubs would have to move one of their high-priced starters (Carlos Zambrano or Ryan Dempster) before they were able to afford Halladay.

The Cubs would have to include Starlin Castro or Josh Vitters and possibly Carlos Marmol in any deal for Halladay then find a taker for one of the contracts (Zambrano or Dempster). As Levine pointed out, Carlos Zambrano has a no-trade clause and is owed a lot of money. Levine mentioned Saturday morning that he feels the Cubs could have a match with Toronto for Halladay if they had room in their payroll.

Levine explained it would be a lot to pay for one year of Roy Halladay (between the money owed and in prospects the Blue Jays would want in return). Levine added any team would need a 72-hour window to discuss and sign Halladay to contract extension ... and Levine thinks Halladay will demand at least a five-year, $100 million contract.

If the Cubs are able to move Milton Bradley in the next couple of weeks, there could be a possibility to make a run at Halladay ... but again, it is not likely.

Jim Hendry would have to go to Tom Ricketts and ask to increase the Cubs' payroll for 2010 by $20 million and Levine does not think that is a conversation the Cubs' GM wants to have with his new boss right now. Levine joked if Hendry could guarantee a World Series win then maybe before acknowledging that with Roy Halladay on the staff the Cubs would be closer to their goal.

Reports on MLB.com and on the MLB Network Saturday night indicated Roy Halladay is not inclined to re-sign with the Toronto Blue Jays once his contract expires. Halladay could have painted his team into a corner ... that could end up costing them talent in return for the ace pitcher.

Milton Bradley

The rumor that was shot down ... Phil Rogers was at it again on Friday and no sooner than his "report" made the rounds, it was shot down by two of the three teams involved ... and Bruce Levine. Levine indicated the Cubs and Rangers have not spoken for a week.

The Rays for Pat Burrell remains the likely destination for Milton Bradley for several reasons.

According to Bruce Levine, the Rays wanted to sign Bradley last winter and offered him a two-year, $18 million contract. The Rays' manager, Joe Maddon, believes he can handle Bradley. Milton would give the Rays a switch-hitting outfielder and DH ... and finally it would rid the Rays of Pat Burrell.

Levine indicated on Saturday morning that the difficult part for the Cubs dealing Bradley to Tampa would be Pat Burrell. He does not fit with the Cubs in any way and would give them another left fielder that strikes out a lot. Burrell would have to be "flipped" to another team, which could create another problem for Jim Hendry.

Luis Castillo

According to the Tribune (and not Phil Rogers), the Cubs have no interest in re-signing Mark DeRosa and would "prefer a left-handed hitting second baseman, which is why they are interested in Luis Castillo."

Luis Castillo would feel needs for the Cubs but would have to be part of a trade that would rid the Cubs of Milton Bradley.

John Grabow

Before John Grabow joined Bruce Levine and Jonathan Hood Saturday morning. Levine reported Grabow signed with the Cubs for less than the Pirates offered him. According to Levine, the Bucs wanted him back and made a three-year, $12 million offer to Grabow. Levine called the signing of Grabow a "good deal" for the Cubs.

John Grabow explained that Chicago was the right place for him and his wife ... and described the Cubs as "a good fit." Grabow likes Lou Piniella and the entire coaching staff and explained he fit in right away after being acquired from the Pirates.

Grabow admitted it is more fun to pitch in a full house. Grabow explained the Pirates have sellouts from time-to-time, usually on fireworks night, but not everyday like it is at Wrigley Field.

Chemistry is a big key to winning according to John Grabow. The results on the field are better when everyone is on the same page ... every player is not going to get along for an entire 162-game schedule, that is just the way it is.

Jonathan Hood asked Grabow what he would like to work on for 2010. Grabow said he wants to cut down on his walks. He plans to work on it during the winter and into spring training. Grabow explained he is not looking to work on just one pitch but to improve his command.

Bruce Levine asked Grabow if there was anything he could help Carlos Marmol with in order to improve for next season. Grabow said the key to Marmol is repeating his delivery and he must stay consistent with his pre-game work ... whether it is on flat ground or with towel drills.

The Sun-Times brought up John Grabow's history of bone chips in his elbow. Grabow is coming off a career high 75 appearances in 2009.

Curtis Granderson

Lee Hamilton (XM Radio) reported on Saturday afternoon that the Tigers are looking for Josh Vitters and Jeff Samardzija from the Cubs for Granderson. Like Phil Rogers, consider the source.

From the Hot Stove

  • According to Bruce Levine, Sean Marshall and his agent see the southpaw more as a starter than a reliever. Levine said a trade could be the best thing for Marshall's career.
  • Henry Blanco to the White Sox? Not likely according to Bruce Levine. He thinks 'Hank White' is looking for too much money.
  • Mike Fontenot could be traded or non-tendered before he makes it to arbitration according to Bruce Levine. Fontenot's Super Two status puts his future with the Cubs in jeopardy. Fontenot will receive a raise in 2010 from the $700,000 to $900,000 range. Players seldom take a pay cut in arbitration regardless if they've had a down year the season before.
  • Marlon Byrd and Mike Cameron are still in the mix for the Cubs if they cannot acquire Curtis Granderson. The Tribune explained the Cubs could go after Byrd if they decide to not wait on the Tigers to deal Granderson.
  • The Fanhouse explained why Marlon Byrd could be one of the "land mines" of the winter. "Two reasons. First of all, he's had three good (but not great) seasons in Texas, meaning he's supported by a solid offense and hitter's park. Secondly, Cubs general manager Jim Hendry has coveted him in the trade market the past two seasons and now he loves him as a free agent, meaning he's destined to sign with the Cubs and greatly disappoint. There's no doubt in my mind."
  • Matt Holliday? The Cubs do not have room for him despite what Jon Heyman keeps reporting ... and the Cubs could not afford him according to the Tribune.

Lou Piniella at Reds Fest

Lou Piniella will be on hand to celebrate the anniversary of the 1990 World Series Champion Cincinnati Reds team. The annual fan fest, modeled after the Cubs Convention, will be held on December 4.

Dusty Baker will be in attendance.

Finally, a quote from Jim Hendry:

"I'm looking forward to Indianapolis. I think it'll be an exciting time for the game." --Hendry, as he anticipates a flurry of trade activity at the winter meetings"

Follow the CCO on Twitter ...
A quick reminder to check the CCO's Community Blog ... Got an opinion? Post it in the community blog and let the Faithful discuss it!

If you don't have an account on the CCO ... sign-up for one to share your thoughts and interact with the rest of the Faithful.

Well, that's the latest ... and I'm sticking to it!

  • jason kremke

    I think the cubs should get cortis grandson from the tigers too play centerfield,and go get stortstop jose reyes,and secondbaseman luis castillo from the mets,also make a trade with the whitesox for jake pavey,and also make a trade for roy halliday,also get one of the melina,s brothers too be one of your backup catchers, either jose or begina

  • Mark

    Bryan I am with you on all points. Thst should bve the lineup. I don't know why the hell the Cubs will give up on Fox and maybe there's a chance I see with Jiohnson's back BUT I am totally with you on Soriano and of course Bradley. Why get rid of him for another waste of money (ie.Burrel) where we all get pissed off again next season? Put Bradley on the bench along with Soriano and make an example. Just think, the 2010 Cubs will be known for the highest paid bench ever and I think baseball fans may like it. You shoot your mouth off, you sit.....you don't produce you sit....end of story!

  • ripsnorter

    Suzy, NOW I understand about why the Cubs got Gorzalanny: Littlefield drafted him initially with the Pirates. Looks to me like Lovie Smith trading away an all pro safety (Harris) so he could trade for his buddy Adam Archuletta. What a bust!



    Here's Littlefield's #1 picks from 2002

    Bullington 2002 Pitcher, if you didn't know

    Maholm 2003

    Walker 2004 C

    McCutchen OF 2005

    Lincoln P 2006

    MOskos P 2007

    Alvarez 3B 2008

    Sanchez C 2009



    How many of these guys have you heard about? Seen in the ML? Want on your roster?



    Maholm? 8-9 194 IP 227 H 31 starts. 16 quality starts. 4.44 ERA with 1.44 WHIP. Could not start for the Cubs' unless we have injuries. And He's the best of 'em.

  • Colin

    Just to be clear about Littlefield, he hasn't been the Pirates GM since 2007. Consequently, the Nady Marte trade was made by Neal Huntington not Littlefield. It was a great trade, in my opinion, as it dumped salary and mediocre players for some decent minor league depth (though it would've been nice if he had got more for marte). Also, it was Huntington not Littlefield that drafted Alvarez and Sanchez the last couple years.



    As for which draft picks I've heard about or seen on a major league roster, Maholm is the Pirates best pitcher, McCutchen is their best fielder, Alvarez is their best prospect, and one of the best in the game, Lincoln still has a shot at being a good major leaguer, and Neil Walker (3B not a C) still has time to figure himself out. I'm not saying there aren't better players out of those draft classes, cause there most certainly were) but there are teams with much worse draft performances in those years.



    The biggest improvement the pirates have made since Huntington came along is how they've spent record sums late in the draft to get as much talent as possible, something that hadn't been done under Littlefield. Theres a lot more room for error in the first round when your willing to buy expensive players in the late rounds.



    Also, McCutchen won't be the next Nate McLouth, he's a completely different, and better, player. A lot more speed, a much better fielder, better hitter for average, but probably not as much power.

  • daverj

    I think Littlefield was a bad GM, but his first round picks were decent (expecially given the circumstances).



    The Pirates made an organizational decision to target players in the draft based on signability (and not talent alone). Thus, they passed over more talented players if it was expected that those players would be looking for huge signing bonus. I'm guessing that strategic decision was strongly influenced by ownership's desire to limit payroll and was not solely a Littlefield decision.



    As for the players themselves, Bullington was clearly a bust. He's still pitching though (most recently with the Blue Jays and their AAA club)and I think he has a decent chance to make it as a middle reliever in the big leagues. Maholm is a solid pitcher who struggled a bit in 2009 after a solid 2008. Without a doubt, Maholm is better than our 5th starter options. Walker has been converted to 3B and is still young enough to have a major league career. Same goes for Lincoln who has electric stuff. McCutchen (as others have noted) could be a superstar ... his upside is much higher than McClouth too as McCutchen put up numbers at age 22 that McClouth didn't have until age 25. As Neil mentioned, it's too early to make a call on the '07-'09 picks (Alverez is very highly touted).



    The big issue with Littlefield was his trades. He traded off star players without getting high quality propsects in return ... ARam, Bay, Jason Schmidt, Kendall and others. Rumor has it that he turned down an offer of Ryan Howard for Kip Wells too ... sounds possible as the Phillies aggressively shopped Howard for starting pitching when Howard was tearing up AAA and the Phils had Thome at 1B.

  • woody34

    It's too early to say anything about his 2007 thru 2009 draft picks. But McCutchen is going to be the next Nate Mclouth. Which imo would look pretty damn good in center field for our team this year.

  • Neil

    With all due respect ... Andrew McCutchen would look very good patrolling center for the Cubs.



    Also, Pedro Alvarez has the tools and should be one of the top 50 prospects in the game prior to next season.



    I agree on Littlefield but both of the players I mentioned would be welcome additions to the Cubs system.

  • SuzyS

    Ripsnorter...not much we can do now.



    I think we all knew this year would be tough until the Ricketts get their sea legs under them.



    They actually did the very best thing for change...Gave Hendry the next to impossible task of righting his wrongs

    with basically the same budget.



    When they make the changes needed...there will be no question as to why they needed to be made.



    I still expect JH to out with Lou and a new GM to select Lou's replacement...and

    build a new management team.



    In the meantime...we'll have to suffer JH's past decisions.

  • SuzyS

    Bryan,

    Fox and Johnson won't be on this team...

    imo.



    Johnson because of concerns re his back

    and Fox because Lou already showed us he won't play him.



    I'm with you re Granderson...and although not ideal...it would be better to do a Hendry retread for a one year deal then to commit to another long term mistake.



    I hope Hendry dosn't get side-tracked

    by the flavor of the moment...like he usually does.

  • Bryan

    Suzy...I don't disagree with you regarding Fox and Johnson, but I know you get the point. We don't need more Pierre, Floyd, JJones "add's" for the sake of upside prospects.

  • Bryan

    To anyone thinking Soriano is going to "turn it around", you're drinking major amounts of Cubs Kool-aid. Ain't going to happen.



    And Granderson is not "a stud". He's a high priced platoon player. And when you read in the media about his "great work ethic", this is Juan Pierre deja vu. Same story we heard then as well...and we know how that turned out.



    The team needs to get younger and more athletic....period. We have to commit to our farm system...not give up prospects for questionable, one-way, high priced vets.



    In a 2010 transition year I'll live with:



    Fuld CF

    Johnson RF (re-sign)

    Ramirez 3B

    Fox LF

    Lee 1B

    Soto C

    Castro SS

    Theriot 2B



    Soriano and Fukodome can then be the highest priced bench (and baby) sitters in baseball. This lineup won't happen, but I don't think it's time to give up on Vitters, Sarmadzjia, etc just yet.

  • rswartz

    Can we afford Granderson if we do not move Bradley?



    If so, that is one more reason to take the above stated deal (if true). Imagine an outfield of Soriano,Fuku, Granderson, Bradley all of them are basically hot/cold players. Lou could play the hot hand and platoon Milt with Grand/Fuku against lefties. I know this is a very highpriced platoon, but lets face it we have already pined ourselves into that situation. Yes, we would also still have the Milton drama, but there seem to be no good options out there right now. Why not try our luck to see if he can turn around w/ Rudy or his trade value ups mid season. We couldn't be in any worse situation than we are now, and would not be forced to play him with addition of Granderson.



    I personally would be happy going in with these lineups.



    Lefty

    1.Granderson/Fuku

    2.Bradley

    3.Lee

    4.Aram

    5.Soriono



    righty

    1.Granderson

    2.Theriot/Fuku

    3.DLee

    4.Aram

    5.Soriono

    6.Theriot/Fuku



    What would be the payroll addition everything else as is, with the Granderson for Vitters/Shark deal?

  • SuzyS

    With all my vitriol towards Bradley...

    It doesn't appear that there is any

    truly worthwhile deal out there for him.



    Burrell is just another unusable piece that the Cubs would end up eating.

    I'm really against that particular deal

    unless the deal is expanded to include talent we can really use.



    Bradley...while extremely high maintenance...is in fact usable.



    I suspect there is another deal out there re Bradley...that we havn't heard about...The best way to do it is to package someone a team really desires

    with Bradley...but then we have to have some team needs filled in return.



    Texas can keep Millwood if they want him.



    Rip...on the Cubs organizational chart...

    Littlefield is listed as "special assistant to Jim Hendry". The same title

    Ed Lynch had as a scout.

    Are you sure he is the director or just a scout?

    Either way it doesn't sound good according to your report.

  • ripsnorter

    Ok, here's the article. I call him the head of scouting; the article says he was hired to scout.



    http://www.mysportsbook.com/news/sports_betting/384526.html



    Believe me: he's incompetent.

  • ripsnorter

    My understand--which could be wrong--was that Littlefield was hired by JHendry as head of Cubs' scouting. Let me do some research and I'll get back with you. My memory might have some rust on it . . . .

  • ripsnorter

    The New York Post reports that the rumored three-way deal with the Cubs, Rangers and Mets involving Milton Bradley, Kevin Millwood and Luis Castillo, first reported by the Chicago Tribune, won't happen because the Rangers do not want to give up Millwood.

  • Jim C (Tinley Park, IL)

    A few thoughts....



    * I would deal the Shark and Vitters for Grandesron. (One problem, The Shark has a no trade clause).



    * I would try and deal Bradley to Atlanta for Derek Lowe. If that can't happen I would swing a deal for Luis Castillo. Sorry, Pat Burrell would be counter productive.



    * At the moment I would say that our best trading chips (Players that don't have No no trade clauses) are Marshall, Dempster, Theriot, Guzman, Marmol and Soto. (Not that they should deal Marmol.

  • ripsnorter

    I sure hope the Cubs do not acquire Burrell or Byrd.



    And if this is true, "Lee Hamilton (XM Radio) reported on Saturday afternoon that the Tigers are looking for Josh Vitters and Jeff Samardzija from the Cubs for Granderson. Like Phil Rogers, consider the source," I'd surely make that deal in a nano-second.

  • ripsnorter

    Yesterday the Pirates DFA Jeff Karstens. Look how he got to the Pirates from the yanks in the first place:



    On July 26, 2008, Karstens was acquired by the Pirates with Jose Tabata, Ross Ohlendorf, and Dan McCutchen from the New York Yankees for outfielder Xavier Nady and pitcher Damaso Marte. The Pirates were ROBBED.



    Dave Littlefield made this trade for the Pirates. He is now the director of Cubs' scouting because he is buddy with JHendry.



    Now read these statements:



    "Littlefield acquired a reputation throughout MLB as a difficult trading partner, in that his demands during negotiations were often seen as grossly excessive.[3] It was rumored that Littlefield turned down a trade offer in 2005 with former GM of the Philadelphia Phillies, Ed Wade, in which the Pirates would swap pitcher Kip Wells for the Phillies' Ryan Howard.[4] There were also unconfirmed reports that Littlefield turned down trading Howard for pitcher Kris Benson a year earlier."



    "In the first 2 years following the Dave Littlefield era, almost every player acquired by Littlefield was purged from the Pirates major league roster, most of them via trade. These trades were made primarily to restock a farm system that was left completely bereft of impact talent and needed to be restocked in order to make the Pirates a long term contender."



    Now, does that give you confidence in JHendry regime? Incompetence! Poor talent evaluation! Ricketts needs to make some changes starting with JHendry! NOW!

  • joel

    Vitters and Samardzija for Curtis Granderson, huh????



    If thats what the Tigers want then I only have one question....WHY THE HECK IS GRANDERSON NOT A CUB YET!!!!!



    Forget Samardzija he looked awful this year even though he has high upside, i look at him as a small price to pay for an absolute stud CF (I think Samardzija's big name will only help the Cubs in this regard as well)



    Samardzija may be a solid starter one day, he may not, and im bettin no higher than an average #3 starter in the AL so ship him to Detroit where he will get rocked by DHs and superior lineups and we will never have to look back and wonder why we got rid of him.



    Vitters is a very good prospect and I would not condone his trading...that is UNLESS it was for someone of Granderson's stature, how long have we waited for a stud CF, a guy with great speed from 1st to 3rd, a Lefty bat, AND power he is a legit 5 tool player (and a Chitown boy to boot)



    Add in Jake Fox to sweeten the deal as a lowcost DH/3B/OF option and get this done!



    Imagine our lineup with a healthy Aram/Soriano



    Murderer's Row:



    3.Derrek Lee .295 30 HRs

    4.Aramis Ramirez .305 30 HRs

    5.Curtis Granderson .270 25 HRs

    6.Alfonso Soriano .267 28 HRs

    7.Geovany Soto .275 20 HRs



    I know I will prolly get harped on for those projections but I fully expect a bounceback season out of Soriano with his health...he is not a 7time allstar for nothing, and besides who would take a .265-.270 28 HR guy in the 6th hole (salary aside)... come on, and add to that the Rudy Jaramillo factor...(if Milton Bradley, Gary Matthews Jr, etc can do it, Soriano certainly can under his tutoring)



    SOTO- Like Soriano I fully expect a rebound year from him, you dont just lightup the minors, win the MVP, tear up the majors and earn a starting spot over Jason Kendall, then go on to win the ROY and be an Allstar and then call it a career... He had a horrible year and a very humbling experience, this could be a blessing in disguise for him. He is training with Dempster who will most definitely whip his weedlovin butt back into shape. And again, the Jaramillo factor



    ARAMIS- If healthy he should hit about 30 HRs and we have yet to have a year where he and DLee both have above career average type years together, well batting in front of Curtis Granderson and Soriano will definitely help that...He will continue to be an RBI machine.



    GRANDERSON- double and triple machine... can steal 20 but has the speed to steal more... He will increase his numbers against LH pitching as a closer look at his numbers revealed alot of unlucky balls in play... Not to mention the Rudy Jaramillo factor. And think bout the RBI opportunities behind Lee and Soriano...



    D-LEE- While I definitely consider last year to be a career-type year and dont expect it to be repeated, he showed all the flashes of his pre-wrist injury self. He was hitting the ball with massive power to the gaps and getting the clutch hits we became so accustomed to earlier. I truly believe he has the power to hit 30+ homers again and with a healthy Aramis behind him all season that will only boost his offense





    As usual...Thoughts??? Anybody?? Anybody?? Bueller????

blog comments powered by Disqus







CCO Twitter Updates




Shop WrigleyvilleSports.com Today!


Twitter Sports

Cubs on Twitter

Displaying tweets tagged with #Cubs

via twitter sports net


Recent Comments


Chicago Cubs Online - Featured On The Web Here

Chicago Cubs Online - one of Chicago's best blogs
Chicago Cubs Online - on Chicago Sun Times Chicago Cubs Online - on Sports Illustrated

ChicagoCubsOnline on YouTube