From the Wire...Aaron Miles to the DL

Vote 0 Votes

According to a report from ESPN in Chicago, the Cubs are expected to place Aaron Miles on the disabled list Monday with a hyperextended elbow.

The report mentioned the Cubs would recall either Bobby Scales or possibly Sam Fuld to take his place on the active roster. The move is expected to be made official before Monday's game against the Pirates.

Updated - 6/28/09 - 1:25pm C.T. - Sam Fuld Recalled from Triple-A Iowa according to the Tribune

Bobby Scales has earned another trip to the big leagues but with Ryan Freel on the roster the right move might be to bring up Sam Fuld.

Fuld has not played in the majors since 2007 but is one of the better defenders in the Cubs' system ... and is on the Cubs 40-man roster.

In 73 games this season for the I-Cubs, Fuld has hit .286/.358/.399 with 16 doubles and eight triples ... not to mention 20-for-25 in the stolen base department.

Stay Tuned...

54 Comments

| Leave a comment

Don't know if it means anything, but Fuld isn't in the lineup tonight for Iowa and Scales is....so perhaps Fuld is on his way.

Good catch, I went to check as soon as I posted the report. With them in Texas, it could very well be Fuld. He has played in the last 10 straight before tonight.

Fuld would make more sense unitl Johnson comes back.
Hope Miles stays there until he is either traded or the season is over.

Next up should be Bradley to the DL...so it's only a 2 year deal....Then maybe we can dump him in the offseason.
Then bat Soriano ninth...so he asks for a trade...and see if Ken Williams has any interest in Fukodome.

SuzyS:

Agreed on all points!

FULD has no bat. That's exact what we don't need. We need a bat. Bring up Scales. And DFA Miles ASAP.

It ought to be obvious that JHendry has sunk this team for years to come. Lengthy, expensive contracts for junk players like Funko, Bradley, Miles, Sorry-oh-no.

I saw that too about Fuld...it makes a whole lot of sense, considering Freel can play 3B (and will split time with Fox most likely) and Fukudome AND Bradley are struggling, which means that Hoffpauir can be in RF, with Fuld in CF, and we get those two bums out of the lineup. When Fox isn't at 3B, you can sub Fox for Soriano.

I'd love this lineup:

Fuld-CF
Theriot-SS
Hoffpauir-RF
Lee-1B
Fox-LF
Fontenot-2B
Soto-C
Freel-3B

It makes a load of sense to all of us to have that lineup....but it won't to Hendry, certainly, and it won't to Piniella.

Taking a look around the league (jumping the gun with a white flag trade a bit)....but if we lose to the Pirates, Brewers, and Cardinals before the break, and don't win at least 2 of those series, then it's time to blow this thing up....here's what's flying around the league:

NL East

Phillies-in desperate need of pitching
*we can offer Lilly or Harden for prospects like Michael Taylor, etc.

Mets-need OF and 1B help
*convince Lee to waive no-trade, and with his value shooting up, we might get good value for him. Also, see if we ate Bradley's salary, if they'd take him, or even Fukudome

Nats-almost anyone is available.
*inquire about Dunn (if we can offload any one of Soriano, Fukudome, or Bradley). Additionally, inquire about Guzman for SS (after we trade Theriot), and Joe Beimel for the pen

NL CENTRAL
(okay...not really realistic to land anyone here with everyone pretty much playing better ball than the Cubs right now...but since the Pirates have been partners in the past...who knows)
Pirates-offloading veterans like LaRoche and Sanchez
*inquire about Sanchez, and even LaRoche if the price is right, and if you can offload Lee too in a separate trade

NL WEST

DBacks-like the Nats and Pirates, they're probably ready to cash it in. Players that could help like Felipe Lopez would make sense
*offer Fontenot for Lopez straight up

Padres-Kouzmanoff has been on the block, and makes a LOT of sense even with ARAM coming back (as he can't go everyday, and has even said so...we'll need a power bat to replace him on those days).
*trade a guy like Mitch Atkins and possibly Jeff Stevens straight up for him

Rockies-at the very last minute of the deadline, we should know what they're going to do...they're still quasi in this, not just for the division, but also the Wild Card. If they're out, the obvious choices for me would be (in order): Brad Hawpe, Seth Smith, Atkins, Spilborghs, Barmes, Street
*for these guys, I would trade just about anyone on our MLB roster...and for that matter, I'd also take on Helton if we could get rid of Lee.

AL WEST

Rangers-need pitching. Chris Davis, Michael Young, Hank Blalock, and Andruw Jones might be on the block
*Personally, I'd see what it'd take to land Ian Kinsler or Nelson Cruz as well
**If we could, I'd ask about their AA first baseman, Mitchell Moreland in ANY trade

AL CENTRAL
the Royals and Indians are the only teams for sure out of the race....the Indians, outside of maybe Victor Martinez, don't really have any attractive, and for that matter, available players (Martinez probably isn't available anyway)

Royals-almost all their veteran players, along with Teahen, are most likely available.
*I would inquire about Teahen AND Juan Cruz in that case

The teams that are mentioned most prominently in rumors recently have been the Rangers, Phillies, and Mets. We have the pieces to help them out....I say go for it.

Lou's postgame comments led me to believe Soriano AND Bradley would probably be out of the next game or so...especially Soriano.

If that's true, then I think major changes have to be coming down, simply because you CANNOT have $28 million riding the pine...if Fukudome is included, then it makes it $40 million on the pine.

I keep wishing and hoping something happens, but Hendry continues to be an idiot, and continues to disappoint.

Aaron...in a normal year...some of your trades are more than viable.

BUT NOT THIS YEAR. Until the sale goes through....NOTHING MAJOR will happen...
(in my opinion).

Hendry would need permission just to
dump...say half salary of Sori/Bradley/
Fuko...AND there is no one to give him the OK....If Ricketts and the Trib agree tomorrow...sometime in August is the best
case...for the sale to go through.

So unless someone will take the whole
salary of any one of our underachievers
(unlikely)...nothing BIG is going to happen.

But look at the bright side...Hendry is no longer free to do any more major damage...and when the new owner comes in...look for a new GM.

Even Lou...the other day...said he may not be the manager in 2010...even though
he is under contract.

If we can't be the best we can be...then let's be the worst...

I just have to say this...in years past I loathed Steve Rosenbloom, and thought he was a turd of a writer...but lately, the dude has been spot on with his assessments, and needed to share this with you, because it's what I've been saying since the offseason:
http://blogs.chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/rosenblog/2009/06/can-anybody-with-the-cubs-do-anything.html

****************************************
Soriano and Milton Bradley aren’t producing. I guess $166 million doesn’t go as far as it used to in these recessive times. Throw in the slumping Kosuke Fukudome, and your entire $200-million-plus outfield could be replaced without hurting your offense with runners in scoring position.

After watching the continued bad play in the field, Brenly wondered aloud why there’s such a big concern with the defense of Jake Fox and Micah Hoffpauir.

Or you could make a deal. The Cubs just watched the dreaded Cardinals pants them on Mark DeRosa, so the time for talking is over. I mean, who’s untouchable on this team?

Look, if general manager Jim Hendry can’t make a move, then move the general manager. I mean, if he could deal players from a team that won 97 games, then he can certainly ship bodies from one that’s in fourth place and two games under .500.

I realize I’m just ranting here. Ranting futilely. Venting over players stealing money and management shrugging shoulders. I don’t expect anything to happen. I expect we’ll get more of what Hope Salesman Lou Piniella offered at the end of his post-mortem Sunday -- that the Cubs have division games coming up, a homestand starting Thursday, a chance to make up ground.

But that only works if you can play baseball.
****************************************

"Look, if general manager Jim Hendry can’t make a move, then move the general manager. I mean, if he could deal players from a team that won 97 games, then he can certainly ship bodies from one that’s in fourth place and two games under .500."

Thank you Steve Rosenbloom for stealing the obvious words out of my mouth that I've been saying for quite awhile now. "if the GM can't make a move, then move the GM"

It's a no-brainer folks. He didn't move in 2006 until it was far too late, and he's not moved a single bit when we lost an even bigger bat than Lee's circa 2006 (in ARAM this year).

Same deal Aaron...why move Hendry now?...
The damage is done...a new owner will want to name his own management team...and make headlines that a new era is here...If Kenney fires Hendry now...he
steals opportune headlines from the new owner....Patience...it will happen.

Trade Sorry-oh,no? What GM has lost his mind that would want him?

Trade Funko? What GM is at least temporarily insane that would want him?

Bradley? 5 HR, 16 RBI in half a season. What completely delusional GM would want him?

Guys, time to just rebuild with a youth campaign. If you're going to try to unload the likes of Soriano, Bradley, Fukodome and Lee (while his value is high), then just go get some young kids with energy and sound fundamentals, and then bring in a Sandberg/Brenly dughouse combination to teach the game the right way (win or lose). Cub fans will always support effort and energy, regardless of the outcome. It's just sad to watch this current state of ego-athletes, playing on the 3rd highest payroll team. Shame on JH for the moves made to paralyze this team, and particularly shame on LOU for already mentally checked out. You watch franchises like the RedSox, Angels and Braves and you just wonder how our management team is so inept with so much money that's been available.

Atleast kudos to Brenly for "telling it like it is". Refreshing!

When I agonize over it, a couple easy moves and this season would have been entirely different. You hang on to DeRosa, and acquire McLouth (who was peddled for nothing to the Braves). You would have had a lineup of:

McLouth CF
DeRosa 2B
Fox LF
Ramirez 3B
Lee 1B
Hoffpauer RF
Soto C
Theriot SS

I think that would have been a lineup, with bench players like Fuld, Scales, and Fontenot, that could have created some excitement on the north side.

But no, instead we have a FULL outfield of immovable contracts. So sad!

And I certainly should have included Reed Johnson to that bench look and feel.

I'm pretty sick of hearing about DeRosa. It seems like the fans and players need to grow up and get over it. Now that he is on the Cardinals, I hope you all could see him more as an enemy.

I liked him when he was on the Cubs and thought trading him only made sense if the Cubs were using those prospects to get Peavy. Now that he's gone, the players playing the "what if" game does nothing good for the team.

While you may be tired of hearing about DeRosa, the fact is he would be leading the team in both HR's and RBI's, and could have played multiple positions.

We got little for him, and now the Cardinals acquired him to a minimal amount as well, and quickly now have a #4 hitter to protect Pujols.

While we may belabor the point to excess, it's about highlighting some of the absurd decisions by Hendry/Pinella. And the DeRosa one was about as bad as it gets.

Who is to say that he wouldn't be slumping if he were on the Cubs.

I don't have the time or patience to look up the numbers, but how much better would their record be if some of the hitters were at least hitting the previous career lows? This "slump" the whole team is in is pretty spectacular.

You could say Bradley is a jamoke, but I don't think he has ever been this bad. Same could be said about Soriano. If these to were playing at their previous career worst, it would at least translate to a few more "W"s.

true, but you also must take into context the fact that DeRosa has been consistent post-steroids era, while Soriano, Bradley, and others on this team (ARAM has been consistent post-steroids era as well) have simply not been consistent.

Bradley....if you really believe he's not this bad...then prove it. You can't. Nobody can, because he averaged 85 games played per season, and in his 2 "full seasons" that he's had, he was average in one, and above average in the other (last season)....you have nothing to go off of.

As for Soriano, his career stats are like a roller coaster. He'll hit .290 one season, then .268 another, then .300 one, then .285 another, and his OBP's...my goodness. They're even crazier than that. Both those are MAJOR stats when trying to project a player. Both of them work hand in hand, and I did an analysis the other week, showing how that works. If a player has an average above .300, and an OBP sitting in the .350 and under range, then you know that his hits have been a product of dumb luck, and more than likely, you'll see his career stats hanging around the .280 and under average range, and .350 and under OBP.

That's why guys like Dunn, Teixeira, AROD, etc. should command more than the Bradley's and Soriano's of the world...but for whatever reason, Hendry prefers to blow money on the inconsistent guys, which is beyond comprehension

Question:

Is there anyway we could get Steve Stone to take over at GM if/when Hendry gets the ax?

Would Brenly be interested in keeping the manager seat warm for Ryno?

Would Grace come back to fill Brenly's position in the booth if question number 2 comes into fruition?

*I don't know the answers to these questions but I know it will surely get interesting over the next 6 months.

Cliff, here's your answer:

1. Yes, I think Steve Stone would love to be the Cubs GM...albeit for the Ricketts, NOT the Trib. Fair enough.

2. Brenly keeping the seat warm? Why in the world would you want to do that? Just hire Brenly and forget about Ryno. Look, I loved Ryno as a player, and maybe in 3-5 years he'd be ready for the majors, but Brenly has already WON THE WORLD SERIES. Hello! I would fire Lou and hire Brenly TOMORROW....of course, only after firing DOOFUS JH tonight.

I think these things should be done immediately. JimK, I know what you're saying, but this situation requires different leadership. That's my opinion, anyway.

I read something on another fan blog that I found interesting that I have always agreed with and I'm curious as to what many of you think.

It's about Len Kasper. While I think he a is a nice guy and professional, I have always found him to be plain vanilla and VERY boring to listen to, much like Joe Buck, who I think is most dull, borrring announcer I have ever heard.

And here's the other point of the story about Len. Some fans were noting how they are tired of hearing him make excuses for the players and not call them out when they should be called out, unlike his partner, who regulary tells it like it is. I always felt that way too. Whenever I hear Kasper interviewed during the winter or outside the games on the radio or whatever, I almost always turn the channel becuase I know he's not going to tell you anything of substance. He always will gloss over the warts of the team and come up with excuses, or you can predict exactly what he's going to say when he answers the questions. Again, VERY boring and dull.

I love Pat and Ron, and I thought Harry was the best of all. Not only because he told the truth, but he made the game sound exciting. I just hate announcers who show the enthusiam of a person on their deathbed. Think about it, a big part of what makes some of the great highlights in MLB history are the calls of the announcer. Example: the shot heard round the world in 1951, with the announcer sreaming "the Giants win the pennant, the Giants win the pennant !!"
Just think if you had Joe "I'm asleep" Buck calling that play ?? It probably wouldn't be half as famous as it is.

And for the record, I also like Jon Miller, Bob Costas, and Vin Scully. Announcers who actually get excited when something exciting on the field happens. Imagine that ?

Anyways, just my .02 cents. Be curious to hear other opinions.

I haven't been able to watch a lot of games lately, been extrememly busy. But what I have been able to watch has been very very disapointing to say the least. There are only a couple of guys who look like they even care anymore.

I have always been a fan and supporter of Hendry, but unless he comes up with a miracle, and soon, it is time for his ass to be canned, heck it's past time.

Hopefully things can turn around, but the way they have looked the last week, I just don't know.

I was a part of buying and/or selling a dozen companies, and that's likely why I go on and on here about trades. The challenge of "the deal" floats my boat.

Strategically, the challenge is working with and/or around big contracts (and nearly all are lamentable). The goal is to get competitive as quickly as possible. The reality is that Z and Soriano (maybe, in a swap of bad contracts in the case of S) likely net three or four highly competitive, proven and/or prospective players. Dome and Bradley likely do not.

I opt for moving Z and Soriano as the first priorities, because to do so makes the goal attainable. Maybe something can be done with Dome and Bradley--but likely with little talent benefit in return. At worst, Dome is around as a part-timer in '10 and '11. DLee will retire as a Cub after next season. And there is no compelling reason why he shouldn't.

Bradley is a costly problem--with only a slight hope that he re-gains reasonable productivity. A lack of knowledge of the details of his contract makes choices speculative. If his games played option is strictly appearances in 75 games this year (and not also defined as 250 AB's, e.g., choices are very limited.

One choice might be to designate Bradley for assignment--IF the 75 game option would then be cancelled. We would eat most of this year's remaining comp and the $10 mil for 2010--but we would save the option year $10 mil. We could also not play him 75 games--but that could be more costly (via a lawsuit, e.g.,) than suffering through his contract.

The slimmest possibility would be that Bradley could become convinced that he doesn't have the physical health and the mental stability to play out his deal. He does acknowledge that he has been terrible, and that he has no one to turn to for help. Then he might walk away with something like a $1 mil a year for the next 10 years.

In another church, the Indians have an interesting wrinkle in their trading strategy. They like to receive a player to be named as part of their comp in deals--apparently a choice among two or three identified prospects. That has gotten them Choo and Brantly in recent deals, and now they have another choice in the Cardinal deal.

Bradley's contract -
http://mlbcontracts.blogspot.com/2005/01/chicago-cubs_112114177768677294.html

Milton Bradley
2 years/$20M (2009-10), plus 2011 option

* 2 years/$20M (2009-10), plus 2011 option
o signed by Chicago Cubs as a free agent 1/6/09
o $4M signing bonus
o 09:$5M, 10:$9M, 11:$12M option
o 2011 may become $12M club option with $2M buyout based on Bradley's health
o 2011 option vests with 75 games played in 2009

* 1 year/$5M (2008)
o signed by Texas as a free agent 12/07
o performance bonuses: $0.325M for 400 PAs, $0.45M for 450 PAs, $0.525M for 500 PAs, $0.7M for 550 PAs, $0.75M for 600 PAs
o award bonuses: $25,000 for Gold Glove, Silver Slugger, LCS MVP; $50,000 for WS MVP, All Star; $0.1M for MVP, $0.2M for Comeback POY
o Bradley to donate $25,000 to club charity

* 1 year/$4M (2007)
o re-signed 1/07 (avoided arbitration)
o may earn $0.4M in performance bonuses
o acquired in trade (from Oakland) 6/29/07 after being DFA 6/21/07 (Oakland paid $1,360,929 to SD to cover portion of remaining $2.05M due in 2007 salary)

* 1 year/$3M (2006)
o re-signed 1/06 (avoided arbitration)
o performance bonus: $0.2M based on plate appearances

* 1 year/$2.5M (2005)
o re-signed 1/05 (avoided arbitration)
o $0.75M in performance bonuses

* 1 year/$1.73M (2004), avoided arbitration 11/03
* 1 year/$0.3143M (2003) 3/03
* 1 year/$0.221M (2002) 3/02
* agents: Levinson brothers
* ML service: 7.169

The most concerning thing for me is the whole 85 game and the '11 option vests... 27 more games and we don't have an option to buy him out after the '10 season!! I think Lou is ROYALLY trying to screw us.

Im seeing around the web the Indians wanted Sean Marshall and PTBNL for Derosa.

hmm i wuold do it i think then sign derosa to a extension
sam fuld called up justt heard it on the score

I would've done it...but I don't know about the PTBNL. Marshall has been awesome for us in the swing role, kind of like Glendon Rusch was in that one successful season he had with us.

He's very valuable, but when you consider that he tends to get lit up about the 2nd or 3rd time through the lineup, and we don't really have a spot for him in the rotation....you do whatever you have to do, and include him in trades, because he's clearly NOT in the long-term plans. And while he might be an excellent lefty specialist out of the pen, I just don't see much value in those type of pitchers anyhow. Any pitcher that throws a fastball that tops out at 88 mph out of the pen, is going to get eaten alive. And like Gregg, if his breaking stuff isn't working, he'll get absolutely torched.

I really do like Marshall though, but in my opinion, one of the guys we got for DeRosa to begin with (Gaub) would fill Marshall's nicely.

My gut feeling though, is the PTBNL would most likely include a guy like Jay Jackson, and that would NOT be okay with me.

I figured the Indians wanted Marshall...I would have given him up in a heart beat. Marshall is completely average. The only reason he's looked at as a commodity is because he's a lefty. Other than that, he hasn't had that one game that's defined him: when he wins, it's usually because of the offense and/or bullpen. When he loses, it's usually cause of him.

Scott....you are too practical and too much a purist. You are leaving out the show business factor. LOL.

I think you have to look at the good and the bad of Brenly's very short managerial career. I do like him, but he was fired shortly after inheriting a team that won it all. I'm sticking with my prediction that Sandberg gets the managerial job.

I agree with Suzy that it will be up to the eventual new owner to make big, new money, changes. I also don't think many veteran managers will want to work for Steve Stone. Like me, he has spent a little too much time as a fill-in singer for one of the (Self) Rightous Brothers.

Jim,

You know me too well! No listen, I'm aware of Brenly's pedigree....but it seems to me that he would bring the style of managing we need (and which Pinella used to have)...and we can't bring Ryno up yet, in my opinion.

I agree that veteran managers probably wouldn't like to work with Stoney. He's a tad sanctimonious, but he's smart as hell and knows baseball as well as anyone I've ever heard or read.

Hey, it's my $.02 worth, I know.

As for show business, hey, I play in a band but I'm the drummer (and occasional singer). I'm always the doofus in the back.

Jim, I like the analysis, and I love the challenge of the deal as well. My read of the situation is that Hendry can't do anything and is going to sit pat. At best he's a lame-duck GM and at worst (which I now believe) he's part of the cancer that is eating at this team.

Look, all of these guys know that JH made these trades, broke up arguably 2008's best team in the bigs, and what has it brought? Angst. Pitiful performances. No clubhouse cohesion. Questions. MORE pressure.

And so they look to the guy who was at one time "one of them", meaning a big-league ballplayer in their manager, and what does Lou do? Shakes his head, claps his hands and says, "Shucks, I have no idea what to do....what should I do? What woud you do?"

I'm LIVID that Lou is acting this way. If he had any designs on managing longer than this season, he would be FIGHTING....not washing his hands and playing it out like he is. It's disgusting.

If everything comes down to dollars, and it does, and if Zell wants to continue to sell out Wrigley the rest of this summer, he would fire JH *and* Lou, and put Brenly in as the interim manager, name WHOMEVER as the GM, and then let Ricketts do what he wants when the sale goes through.

That way Brenly knows he's auditioning for the full-time job (whether it's in Chicago or elsewhere) and starts managing this team the way it should be managed. And I don't care if it's $140million or $200 million riding the pine. The TEAM will know who's in charge, they would rally around a PROVEN manager, and the "kids" would love to play for him.

THAT is what I want to see. :)

TOP TEN REASONS WHY HENDRY SHOULD BE FIRED:

1) Signing Milton Bradley, who averaged 85 games played, had a career year last year at only 22 hr, 77 RBI, and has been the center of controversy

2) Trading DeRosa for 3 pitchers not even on a top 30 prospects list of the Indians, moreover, 2 of the 3 were average at best in their respective levels (Stevens and Gaub), while also being a few years older than typical competition (never a good sign) at those levels. It would've been one thing to trade DeRosa for a Juan Pierre-esque haul, but it's entirely different when you practically gave him away. Interesting how he was one of the most sought after players out there on the market this summer.....Hendry is such a tool, and has to be the laughing stock of all MLB GM's out there.

3) Giving Soriano an 8 year contract at $136 million. (might've made sense for a consistent player like a Mark Teixeira...or AROD type of player, but not a guy so up and down like Soriano). Also, rule of thumb Jim Hendry....You NEVER sign a guy that far into his 30's, when one of his greatest assets is his legs...you just don't do that. They tend to break down easier

4) Trading 3 top pitching prospects for a one year rental in Pierre. Sure, this would've made sense if you landed yourself a Johan Santana...or a Mark Teixeira....But NOT a player like Pierre, who was a one year rental. Nolasco is one of the more exciting young starting pitchers in the game (though he's struggled this year), and Pinto would've been a solid lefty for us out of the pen. After leaving the Cubs, Pierre has essentially become a part-time player....I think that shows how other teams value him, doesn't it?

5) Not firing Dusty Baker as soon as he lost control of his team in 2004...also, a case could be made for firing Lou this year, as he has clearly ALSO lost this team. When the players started calling the press box to complain, and Hendry did NOTHING to control it, nor Baker...it showed signs of things to come. Hendry clearly was siding with the overpaid babies in the clubhouse who couldn't handle any sort of criticism. It's also clear that those are EXACTLY the types of players Hendry has gone after since...and ones that question the heart and desire (Edmonds, DeRosa, and Wood) are either traded or not re-signed as free agents.

6) Trading Jose Ceda, a 100 mph flame-throwing future closer for a guy that was going to be non-tendered in a month (Kevin Gregg), who was coming off a season in which he injured his knee AND blew 9 saves...one of which coming at the hands of the Cubs with a home run from Daryle Ward, who at the time, couldn't hit the broad side of a barn if it were staring directly at him.

7) Trading the likes of Rich Hill, Jason Marquis, Felix Pie, Cedeno, Corey Patterson, Greg Maddux, etc. for next to nothing. Most teams would be able to get more in return for even a poor season of Jason Marquis, and a down year for Maddux, but the best Hendry could net for all of them was essentially: Heilman, Vizcaino, and Izturis. It appears Jimbo is a very poor seller of talent.

8) In 8 years at the helm, Hendry has stuck with his bff Rothschild, and it's an absolute joke. A telling sign was in 2006, when many of our young pitchers turned to Greg Maddux, instead of Rothschild for pitching help. It's also a telling sign when highly touted guys like Juan Cruz, Kyle Farnsworth, Rich Hill, Carlos Marmol, Kerry Wood and Mark Prior (unable to correct their mechanics to avoid injury), Sergio Mitre, and dozens more have blown through our minor league system, then regressed considerably when they reached the big leagues with Rothschild. Furthermore, David Aardsma is another classic example of Rothschild not being able to fix a pitcher. The funny thing is, prior to coming to us, he was with the Giants, and did not have very good coaching. He also didn't do that bad for us in 2006 with a 4.08 ERA (especially considering what we have now). Sure, the Red Sox weren't able to fix him, but I think that's more of a product of him switching coaches too much than anything.

9) Signing Aaron Miles to essentially replace DeRosa on the team. When DeRosa was coming off a season in which he hit 20+ hr, 80+ RBI, Hendry goes out and signs 2 players that COMBINED, could barely top his offensive output.

10) A farm system that hasn't produced any solid MLB players from the draft, not just when he's been GM, but even when he was in player development. In fact, the only player of note to last long with our team...or any team for that matter at the MLB level, has been Kerry Wood. So......when your claim to fame has been Wood, ARAM and Lofton trade, and the Lee trade, and you haven't gotten anything out of your minor league system.


So, in conclusion, it seems Hendry doesn't have control of this team in any way...either by hiring/firing the right staff, and by holding everyone accountable for their actions. Additionally, he can't produce anything out of our minor league system. When forced to make trades, he usually gets fleeced. When he signs free agents, he doesn't do his research into finding the best possible fit, nor does he consider consistency when making those decisions. So, when he's either a buyer of talent (either FA or through deadline trades), he gets fleeced, and when he's a seller (Hill, Patterson, Pie, DeRosa, etc.), he almost always gets fleeced as well.

It's quite clear that his claim to fame trades, netting Karros and Grudz, ARAM and Lofton, and Lee, have kind of made him into a GM beyond reproach.

Well, the honeymoon is over. We're no longer Cubs fans that are satisfied with Bud and Old Style in the bleachers, hoping our favorite player hits a home run (and nothing more). We demand better, and EXPECT better from our team, especially with the 3rd highest payroll in ALL of baseball. If we don't make some BIG moves shortly, our season is most certainly over...and if that's the case, then Hendry needs to update his resume, and so does everyone else in the organization.

aaron:

I agree with all except:

I wanted Marshall in the rotation, so I didn't care if Marquis got traded. I was hoping that he could have gotten a little more than Vizcaino.

Great post - I completely agree.

I can't wait for the Steve Stone era to begin.

I can agree with some points, but you seem to contradict youself quite a few times (and in the past).

I am confused with your thinking. Is it his player evaluation that is bad or his decision on coaches? It really can't be both.

If he can't judge players, then Rothschild is not a bum and that would infer that his coach selection is pretty good. Is it the coaches he selects? Then his player evaluations, at least for pitchers, is spot on.

As far as consistency's sake, please point out DeRosa's consistency prior to joining the Cubs. He was a part time player until that point. Statistics would tell you that his years with the Cubs were the exception and not the norm. If I remember correctly, that is the reason no one was excited about his signing a few years ago. Hendry tried doing the same with Bradley, but it hasn't worked as nicely to this point.

Regarding Pierre, he wasn't signed as a part-time player. He did get a rediculous contract by the Dodgers to be their full time CF.

Aaron Miles has proven to be a mistake, but let's not pretend that the Cubs expected him to put up DeRosa numbers, or to start for that matter. They expected reasonable numbers from Fontenot.

Paul...Paul...Paul....I guess I'm going to have to watch out for you from now on, making unfounded accusations....this is like the 3rd time in the last week you've said, "you seem to contradict yourself quite a few times (and in the past"...to which I responded all to your past accusation, shooting down your points, proving what I said (and having others back me up on here)...so, I guess I'll do it again.

1) Player evaluation and poor decisions on coaching are NOT mutually exclusive, so you're reaching there, trying to say I'm contradicting myself. First of all, you CAN be bad at both, and he HAS been bad at both. I'm not sure what your thought process was there, Paul...Honestly...I guess you were just trying to make something of nothing...But anyhow, I don't know of any coaches in the game that have lasted through 4 coaching regimes. Do you? I mean, literally EVERYONE but Yosh Kowano was replaced on the staffs...even trainers, but Rothschild remained. Given the track record, and how Mazzone and Duncan have built their respective pitching staffs, molding players, and correcting mechanics, one has to wonder what it is that Hendry sees in Rothschild...because it's clearly not much to the naked eye. As for player evaluations, I think it's pretty clear that Hendry CANNOT evaluate talent through trade or free agency...at least not the RIGHT talent. Do I really need to post examples of the Carlos Lee vs Soriano, and Dunn/Abreu/Ibanez vs Bradley signings again. The statistical analysis showed that on all counts, Lee, and either of Dunn/Abreu/Ibanez would've been solid (and less expensive) choices...and in both cases, Lee, Dunn, and Ibanez wanted to come here (not sure about Abreu). But Hendry, instead went the route of "promise"...as in "when Soriano is streaking, he's unstoppable" or "when healthy, Bradley's one of the most lethal hitters in the game". those were actual quotes by the way....Really? So what happens Jimbo, when Soriano is NOT streaking....and what happens when Bradley is NOT healthy...which in both cases, you have observed Soriano being in extreme cold stretches, and Bradley averaging 85 games played per year.....
That, my friend, is what I was driving at there.

2) If your assumption that they are mutually exclusive (Hendry's decision-making and Rothschild), then you might be correct....but, they're simply NOT mutually exclusive. If Duncan and Mazzone, and even Kerrigan can take non-performing pitchers like:
-the entire Pirates staff
-Looper, Wellemeyer, Piniero, etc.
-years of the best staffs in the league in Atlanta.....

and we have arguably some of the best arms in the league come through our system with the likes of: Wood, Prior, Z, Cruz, Farnsworth, Hill, Marshall, Wellemeyer (before), Marmol, Guzman, etc. And, not only can't he get them going consistently, but ESPN commentators, Steve Stone, and others around the league saw problems with their mechanics that led to arm issues down the road....that's where Dave Duncan, Mazzone, and Kerrigan are geniuses. They spend time trying to correct flaws, rather than letting them go out there and "work it out themselves" leading to demotions and confidence related issues. Hendry, on the other hand, seems to think he can take on these projects like other teams do, and hit gold. But he doesn't have the "teachers" that other teams do. A large majority of his free agent signings are not considered projects, but he's tried his hand, and failed miserably in almost every case. Even Dempster would've been a lost cause had it not been for his own off-season efforts getting in shape, and throwing on the side.

3) Actually, once DeRosa was thrust into a starter's role, he showed consistency, and got better every year....sorry, you don't have an argument there. The stink when he was signed originally, was that it was not a major splash, and he was seen as an everyday utility player, which our fan base didn't understand (even I didn't understand it at the time). The difference between Bradley and DeRosa is DeRosa didn't have character issues, wasn't injured all the time, and for the past 4 years, has been a model of consistency. (look up the stats and see for yourself)

4) "After leaving the Cubs, Pierre has essentially become a part-time player" nice try with that one....but those are my exact words buddy...and it's the truth. Nowhere did I say, "he was signed to be a part-time player"...I said he's become that with the Dodgers.

5) "Signing Aaron Miles to essentially replace DeRosa on the team." Actually, those were my exact words, while you inferred that I was saying he was signed to replace his stats. I went on to say that combined, Bradley and Miles barely had better stats than DeRosa. I was saying that if 2 players were signed, and they could barely put up the numbers of a guy you traded away, then clearly it was NOT the right decision.

I'm going to let the Lee/Soriano thing go because you can't understand your own statistics. Your analysis always deals with statistics "in hindsight." Unfortunately, the real world doesn't work that way. You'd be a great GM in the What You Should Have Done world. If we want to play that game, I always thought the Cubs started their spending a year too late. I would rather they have given Carlos Beltran the big contract a year earlier.

You say that the Cubs had some of the best arms, but someone had to identify them and get them in the system to begin with.

Your exact quote regarding JP was " After leaving the Cubs, Pierre has essentially become a part-time player....I think that shows how other teams value him, doesn't it?" At the time he was a free agent and left the Cubs, other teams valued (overvalued actually) him as a $10mil/year starting center fielder. That is a pretty high value.

How can you even consider DeRosa's numbers as steady improvement while dismissing Bradley's. He averaged only 83 games a year prior to signing with the Cubs. I again will say that it appears that Hendry, so far, swung and missed on Bradley, but he took the same statistical chance on him as he did on the beloved DeRosa.

actually, no he didn't...because DeRosa cost in 3 years what Bradley cost in 1 year...so, sorry, buddy..you lost that argument. furthermore, you lose on that point that DeRosa was healthy and Bradley was not...so Bradley was the greater risk there, given the fact if you don't play, you can't produce. Bradley was given 10 years as a regular player to produce, and couldn't stay healthy...or produce to the level you'd expect out of a $10 million/yr player, right?. I think that speaks volumes about risk, don't you?

As for your comment: "You'd be a great GM in the What You Should Have Done world"

Really?!? Because I'm pretty sure I made the same comments then (offseason of 2006 with Carlos Lee vs Soriano), and (offseason of 2008 with Dunn/Ibanez/Abreu vs Bradley)...so, sorry buddy...you lost there too. I was VERY outspoken in 2006, and said how Carlos Lee absolutely crushed the ball at Wrigley in his career, and how great of an addition he'd be, along with his consistency then (prior to the 2007 season)...Additionally, I cited the same reasons for NOT wanting Bradley, and favoring Dunn for the same damn reasons.

I don't really get where you're coming up with that, other than pulling it out of thin air, as everyone on here knows I thought Carlos Lee was better than Soriano and Dunn better than Bradley, so your contention that I'm pulling out the "what if" cards after the fact simply are bogus...because I called it then, just as I called it now. How did I do that? By analyzing statistics of course...the same statistics you same to rail on me over...It's hilarious that there are fans like you out there that don't see the value in them when judging what type of contract to give to a free agent. Moreover, WHO to target in free agency.

You and Jim Hendry should get together, as you both seem to be of the same ilk. You know...of the non-research variety

I wasn't talking financials, but player statistics. If that wasn't clear to you, that was my mistake. No matter how much you don't like Bradley, even you can't admit you saw him being this bad. Seems like your arguments are mainly related to durability (For the record, I wanted and posted they should go after Abreu).

"Statistics" tell me that Carlos Lee had batting averages from 2001 - 2006 of .269 .264 .291 .305 .265 .300 in chronological order. Given his "consistent" numbers, please predict his 2007 batting average within .005 points with valid statistical reasoning using a 5% confidence level. My point always was that he was no more consistent than Soriano. I don't ignore statistics. I just know how they can be manipulated to prove a point.

I did not know you in 2006, therefore I can care less about what you said at that time. I do know that your argument for Lee's "consistency" included numbers from 2007-2009. It would be wonderful to look into the future and see stats that haven't occured when signing free agents. When all you have is the past stats, that's all you can use. Soriano didn't play at Wrigley often enough to use that variable.

You may have liked Lee more than Soriano, and to be perfectly honest it was a close call. Their contracts were even similar. But the statistics don't show a large gap, if any between the two.

I say that we fire our piece of crap pitching coach and go out and get mad-dog

I'd love to see this too, but I have a feeling that the line is going to be pretty long for the teams seeking Maddux's services. He would probably end up the highest paid coach ever! If I remember right Maddux got out of baseball because he wanted to spend more time with his family and not around baseball. But, I don't see what a phone call could hurt.

Anyone know what Rothschild's contract status is? I can't find it for the life of me.


Text size: Cubs calling up outfielder Sam Fuld

By Paul Sullivan | Tribune staff reporter

PITTSBURGH - The Cubs will call up Triple-A Iowa outfielder Sam Fuld today to replace Aaron Miles, who is headed to the 15-day disabled list with a hyper-extended right elbow.

Fuld, 27, played in 14 games for the Cubs in 2007, making a memorable catch in right field during the pennant race. He is 0-for-6 as a Cub, but hit .286 at Iowa, including .417 in his last 10 games.

Fuld also has 20 stolen bases, playing center field primarily. The former Stanford star gives the Cubs a left-handed bat off the bench and a defensive replacement for Milton Bradley in right.

Greeting Cub fans all of you at one time or another have hit the problems of the Cub organization right on the button!the truth is always hard to swallow when not only the stats.support failure but we the fans can smell the ligering scent of dead baseball in the North side of Chicago!The sale of this team needs to be expedited in order to install changes and restore baseball savey on the North side

I read something on another fan blog that I found interesting that I have always agreed with and I'm curious as to what many of you think.

It's about Len Kasper. While I think he a is a nice guy and professional, I have always found him to be plain vanilla and VERY boring to listen to, much like Joe Buck, who I think is most dull, borrring announcer I have ever heard.

And here's the other point of the story about Len. Some fans were noting how they are tired of hearing him make excuses for the players and not call them out when they should be called out, unlike his partner, who regulary tells it like it is. I always felt that way too. Whenever I hear Kasper interviewed during the winter or outside the games on the radio or whatever, I almost always turn the channel becuase I know he's not going to tell you anything of substance. He always will gloss over the warts of the team and come up with excuses, or you can predict exactly what he's going to say when he answers the questions. Again, VERY boring and dull.

I love Pat and Ron, and I thought Harry was the best of all. Not only because he told the truth, but he made the game sound exciting. I just hate announcers who show the enthusiam of a person on their deathbed. Think about it, a big part of what makes some of the great highlights in MLB history are the calls of the announcer. Example: the shot heard round the world in 1951, with the announcer sreaming "the Giants win the pennant, the Giants win the pennant !!"
Just think if you had Joe "I'm asleep" Buck calling that play ?? It probably wouldn't be half as famous as it is.

And for the record, I also like Jon Miller, Bob Costas, and Vin Scully. Announcers who actually get excited when something exciting on the field happens. Imagine that ?

Anyways, just my .02 cents. Be curious to hear other opinions.

Iagree with your view of Len Kasper,and if you like to come off your chair as play by play was to be. Then you would have enjoyed the broadcast of Burt Wilson in the early 1950s on radio.He brought excitment with every play.Old Timers will relate to Burt

user-pic

I guess everyone likes Kasper, becuase no one else even commented.

oh well.
:-)

I guess the long-awaited arrival of Sam Fuld has everyone just so excited !!!

yippeee !!

By my recollection, didn't the offense kind of spark the last time Miles went on the DL. And then go into a funk again when he returned. Memo to the Cubs, stop making up injuries for this guy and DFA him, please!

I say kind of, because it hasn't really sparked all year, but that was close.

Good to see Sam in the fold! I have always liked his play, the poor man's Rejo with added speed, something this team has lacked and lacked and lacked!

Scott....You don't get any extra points for modestly valuing your dollar's worth of content at 2 cents. Your takes make sense AND you can do the pre-game National Anthem too.

I'm not defending Lou, but I think his seeming lack of concern is his style (disturbing as it can be). Most modern managers do not throw their players under the bus in public forums unless the player does something like attack a fan with a bat. As an example, Torre said something like, "We're not going to judge Manny. The Commisioners Office will take care of any punishment, and we'll see how Manny is after that."

If Lou wasn't being eaten up inside, he wouldn't have called Bradley a piece of crap. I would like to see him take the exit ramp after the season, because it has worn him out. Given the way things are going, I think Lou will give our young hopefuls a lot of playing time in the second half.

Aaron....Most of your points seem valid to me. A couple aren't. It is not factual that DeRo was traded so we could sign Miles. DeRo (and Woody) were traded for some of the money JH needed to cover built-in payroll increases and other signings (Demp and some a couple ill-starred ones.) Marquis also was traded for money.

Nobody is completely without merit (as you point out with a few good JH deals). It also noteworthy, IMO, that our farm system talent is much better now than it was three or four years ago. With Micah and the multiple call-ups from AAA, we are seeing some talent. Wouldn't it be about perfect if Blanco could hit .280? That guy is one exciting player in the field.

I wasn't saying that DeRo was essentially traded for Miles...what I was saying, however, is that Miles essentially replaced him on the roster (2 different things, as I pointed out to Paul as well). If he were, then they'd have to sign a guy that hit 20+ hr, 80+ RBI, and that clearly wasn't Miles...but they were hinging their hopes on Fontenot (which I also said in the past was foolish), because he hadn't proven anything yet. I realize DeRosa, Wood, and Marquis were traded/not re-signed in order to land Bradley...I get that. But it was foolish nevertheless.

Our farm system indeed, is better than 3 or 4 years ago...but still not competitive with other teams. The reason is simple...we can't develop young power that teams on the rise almost always have (I've also posted on here before the teams throughout the league with 30 and under power hitters, and how their teams are better poised for future success). Micah could be that guy....maybe....Fox could be that guy....maybe, but as it is currently, we have two 33+ yr old "power hitters" in Lee and Soriano not showing much of anything this year, one 30 year old power hitter (ARAM) on the shelf with a dislocated shoulder that might not ever be the same again, and a 26 year old pudgy catcher that given his ROY performance with 20+ hr has the potential to fill that void (not showing it this year though)....so, we're still very much in danger when Vitters is our only legitimate power prospect in the minors right now.

RE: Blanco....Wasn't it you or Jim (TP) that said before that he reminded you of Neifi? No thanks...he might be a slick defender, but brings back bad Neifi memories. He even has a similar stance, and HUGE holes in his swing just like Neifi did.

Bradley in the 6 hole tonight with Sori leading off again.

Huge changes Lou, remember you said that only a few days ago.

Soriano
Theriot
Lee
Fox
Soto
Bradley
Freel
Blanco
Harden

Leave a comment

GreatSeats.com
Cubs Tickets

for Home and Away Games




Cubs Rooftop Tickets
at Skybox on Sheffield


JustGreatTickets.com is the local source for
Cubs Tickets
MLB teams Tickets
Chicago Bulls Tickets
Bears Tickets
Blackhawks Tickets




What is Eamus Catuli

What is Eamus Catuli?
Lakeview Baseball Club


iPhone Apps featuring the CCO


Cubs iPhone Apps
FanMisery.com - Chicago Cubs

Cubs iPhone Apps
FanPulse - Chicago Cubs FanPulse - ChicagoCubsOnline


CCO Sponsors


Ticket Lodge
Discount Chicago Cubs Tickets
www.theticketlodge.com



www.stadiumseats.com
www.stadiumseats.com


References & Links





Subscribe in a reader

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Subscribe via email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Chicago Cubs Online - Poll

Grading the Cubs Off-Season ... Pitchers and catchers report on February 17 and off-season marks are being handed out. What grade has Jim Hendry earned this winter?


CCO Twitter Updates



Shop WrigleyvilleSports.com Today!


Stay Classy Cubs Fans!





Chicago Cubs Online - Featured On The Web Here

Chicago Cubs Online - one of Chicago's best blogs
Chicago Cubs Online - on Chicago Sun Times Chicago Cubs Online - on Sports Illustrated