The Cubs Payroll for 2009 and Beyond

Vote 0 Votes

With the recent struggles and the delay of the ownership change, many are concerned about how the team can and will move forward this season. According to many reports the Cubs payroll for 2009 is set around the $140 million mark. Until the Ricketts Family is in charge many are concerned the Cubs will not have room to add the players they need for this season.

So while the rumors begin to swirl, here are the numbers for this season and beyond.

The Cubs' 40-man roster currently has 36 players on it with three on the 15-day DL (Aramis Ramirez, Chad Fox and Rich Harden). There has been a lot of talk centering on the fact the Cubs need to make changes with Aramis Ramirez out of action until at least the All-Star break and the CCO was asked to publish the current contracts of the players on the Cubs' big league roster.

So while bantering back and forth on which players the Cubs can and cannot trade, keep in mind what they are owed and when they will become free agents...but most importantly which of the Cubs' high-priced players have full no-trade clauses in their contracts.

Pitchers

  • Jose Ascanio - $405,000 in 2009 - Automatic Renewal in 2010
  • Mitch Atkins - $400,000 in 2009 - Automatic Renewal in 2010
  • Justin Berg - $400,000 in 2009 - Automatic Renewal in 2010
  • Neal Cotts - $1.1 million in 2009 - Becomes Free Agent following 2009 season
  • Ryan Dempster - $8 million in 2009 - Signed through 2011 with a player option for 2012
  • 2010 - $12.5 million
  • 2011 - $13.5 million
  • 2012 - $14 million
  • *After 2009 Dempster will have 10-and-5 rights and the Cubs will have to have permission in order to trade him.
  • Chad Fox - $575,000 in 2009 - Becomes Free Agent following 2009
  • Kevin Gregg - $4.2 million in 2009 - Becomes Free Agent following 2009
  • Angel Guzman - $421,500 in 2009 - Arbitration Eligible in 2010
  • Rich Harden - $7 million in 2009 - Becomes Free Agent following 2009
  • Kevin Hart - $407,500 in 2009 - Automatic Renewal in 2010
  • Aaron Heilman - $1.625 million in 2009 - Arbitration eligible in 2010 - Becomes Free-Agent following 2010
  • Ted Lilly - $12 million in 2009 - Signed through 2010
  • 2010 - $12 million
  • Carlos Marmol - $575,000 in 2009 - Arbitration Eligible following 2009 - Eligible for Free Agency following the 2012 season
  • Sean Marshall - $450,000 in 2009 - Arbitration Eligible in 2010
  • Marcos Mateo - (no financial information available)
  • David Patton - Major League minimum - Automatic Renewal in 2010
  • Jeff Samardzija - $1.6 million - Signed through 2011 with club options for 2012 and 2013 - Full No-Trade Clause
  • 2010 - $1.6 million
  • 2011 - $1.6 million
  • Jeff Stevens - $400,000 in 2009 - Automatic Renewal in 2010
  • Randy Wells - $402,000 in 2009 - Automatic Renewal in 2010
  • Carlos Zambrano - $17.75 million in 2009 - Signed through 2012 with a vesting player option for 2013 - Full No-Trade Clause for entire length of contract
  • 2010 - $17.875 million
  • 2011 - $17.875 million
  • 2012 - $18 million
  • 2013 - $19.25 million (becomes a player option if Zambrano is first or second in the 2011 Cy Young vote or if he finishes in the top 4 of the 2012 Cy Young vote and is healthy at the end of the 2012 season)

Catchers

  • Koyie Hill - $475,000 in 2009 - Becomes Free Agent following 2009 season
  • Geovany Soto - $575,000 - Automatic Renewal in 2010 - Arbitration Eligible in 2011

Infielders

  • Mike Fontenot - $430,000 in 2009 - Automatic Renewal in 2010
  • Ryan Freel - $4 million in 2009 - Becomes Free Agent following 2009 season - Orioles pays remainder of Freel's contract for 2009 - terms of trade involving Joey Gathright is Cubs pay remainder of Gathright's contract for 2009
  • Micah Hoffpauir - $407,500 in 2009 - Automatic Renewal in 2010
  • Derrek Lee - $13 million in 2009 - Signed through 2010 with a Full No-Trade Clause
  • 2010 - $13 million
  • Aaron Miles - $2.2 million in 2009 - Signed through 2010
  • 2010 - $2.7 million
  • Aramis Ramirez - $15.65 million in 2009 - Signed through 2010 with a Full No-Trade Clause through 2010 - Player Option in 2011, Club Option in 2012 - $1 million bonus if traded after 2010 - Ramirez can opt out of his contract following the 2010 season
  • 2010 - $15.75 million
  • 2011 - $14.6 million (player option)
  • 2012 - $16 million (club option with a $2 million buyout)
  • Bobby Scales - Major League Minimum - Automatic Renewal in 2010
  • Ryan Theriot - $500,000 in 2009 - Arbitration Eligible in 2010 - Eligible for Free Agency following the 2012 season

Outfielders

  • Milton Bradley - $5 million in 2009 - Signed through 2010 with a Vesting Option for 2011
  • 2010 - $9 million
  • 2011 - $12 million option that vests after 75 games played in 2009
  • Jake Fox - $401,500 in 2009 - Automatic Renewal in 2010
  • Kosuke Fukudome - $11.5 million - Signed through 2011
  • 2010 - $13 million
  • 2011 - $13.5 million
  • Sam Fuld - $401,500 in 2009 - Automatic Renewal in 2010
  • Reed Johnson - $3 million in 2009 - Becomes Free Agent following 2009
  • Alfonso Soriano - $16 million in 2009 signed through 2014 with a Full No-Trade Clause
  • 2010 - $18 million
  • 2011 - $18 million
  • 2012 - $18 million
  • 2013 - $18 million
  • 2014 - $18 million

Other Financial Commitments for 2009

  • Luis Vizcaino - $3,287,432 (includes remainder of $500,000 buyout for 2010)
  • Chad Gaudin - $2 million
  • Jason Marquis - $875,000
  • Joey Gathright - $800,000
  • Paul Bako - $178,279
  • Richie Robnett - $400,000
  • Brad Snyder - $405,000

Source: Cot's Baseball Contracts
Transactions Glossary - Cot's Baseball Contracts

Please keep in mind financial information can vary from source to source. Cot's Baseball Contracts is known to have the most accurate contract information available.

21 Comments

| Leave a comment

You would think that with a budget of $140m that JH and LP could produce a better caliber on the field. This isn't about available dollars, it's about spending it on the right players who are hungry, young, flexible, and want to compete every day within a team construct. And it should also include a manager that has a roadmap for developing and playing a mix of veterans and youngsters together.

Lou has given up, and the players have stopped responding to him. This was his M.O. in previous gigs as well. Perhaps LOU should take some hints from the Blackhawks and Bulls. Lou, you build with youth and energy!

I think that we need a big trade. Are planning to resign Rich Harden? Neil what do you think the Cubs will do.

Neil, Thanks for running this. It will be a great reference point for discussing possible trades.
For me, Soriano's contract by itself
is particularly irksome...He is not
going to get better as time goes on.

Soriano, Dempster, Bradley...are three cases of Hendry misreading the market at
the time of signing AND overcommitting the Cubs.

I don't know if he overread the market for Soriano. Dempster and Bradley, yes. But Soriano was the biggest free agent of '07, coming off a 40/40 season and had been moved to a position he seemed to fit at. It was either the Cubs overpay for him or the Yankees or Red Sox would. And, for the price we paid, he has been a catalyst for getting to the past two playoff appearances, so it worked out.

But Dempster and Bradley I agree with. On Dempster, it seemed like every team was pretty much expecting his performance to drop. He probably would've been signed by another team, but he still wanted to come back to Chicago and, if we offered him less, chances are he still would've signed with us.

And Bradley...yeah. We could've signed him for less, too. The big thing with that deal is that the Phillies put pressure on us after outbidding us on Ibanez. That was the number one outfield target, and once he got taken, we had to move on somebody else. Hindsight aside, Bradley probably could've signed for less, but once you spook Hendry on one signing, you can rush his hand on a bad one.

You are more than welcome

unfortunately we have followed the model of signing older players to huge long term deals with no trade clauses. Not only is our roster overpaid, but no one wants any of them. Teams that are winning these days are developing there own players and filling in the holes with a free agent here and there. We have traded every prospect who looked decent for as long as I can remember and always held on to the ones that turn out to be busts. The yankees have proven the last few years that a high payroll does not guarantee sucess on the field. Unless a miracle trade happens, we are stuck with the main pieces of this team for the next few years and with no big time prospects in sight other than vitters. This team reminds me of the 04 team. We were coming off of 2 sucessful seasons in a row yet, management felt compelled to totally gut the roster of anyone who had a positive influence in the club house. I am beginning to believe that we will never win a world series as long as pinella is our manager. He is good enough usually to get a team to the playoffs but then nothing after that. These guys have looked lifeless and have not exactly been playing the cream of the crop the past week. I hope I am wrong but, I think we are in for a long season.

The formula for winning in the bigs is to have a great system and develpment program and with a big city budget to acquire productive supplemental free agents and perhaps a big gun or two. The Cubs and Hendry have npt been able to put together a serious contender with a budget of $140mm and have placed far too much faith in big ticket flawed and unmanagable players. You cannot entirely buy or trade your way to great teams in the MLB...there needs to be a base. If the current woes continue the blessing in disguise may be a chance at a new start with some top tier general management with the right vision all the way through the farm system to Pro player evaluation and acquisition. Unfortunately there are untradable contracts that may not fit into any new system.

The problem really has been Hendry either unjustly over-values prospects, or completely misreads the future market for them, and dumping them for a small portion of what he should've received for them.

The guy doesn't know how to trade/develop/evaluate talent (otherwise we'd have Hamilton now, and he would've gotten a larger return for the likes of Hill, Pie, Cedeno, Ceda, etc.)

He also is clueless when it comes to free agent signings. I don't care if you have a $140 million budget or a $40 million budget...you still should be held accountable for what you put on the field, and Hendry just has not been accountable. He's slow to react to the market, thus missing out on guys, and over-values his own, thereby misreading the market (Dempster is a classic example). Dempster, while not a bad pitcher, is merely just an average pitcher coming off one of Hendry's favorites----a career year.

After the 2006 disaster, the team needed a clear direction. Hendry was finally given the funds to compete with the likes of the Red Sox and Yankees for top-notch talent, and yet he lacked he clear vision. Once you're given that, you must act, and say, "okay, we're going with OBP (which clearly was the direction that needed to be taken)" Or, "we're going to front-line starting pitching with guys that have a clean health record (obviously another need after the Wood/Prior cases)"

But rather than go after front-line starting, which he clearly needed after losing his true aces in Prior and Wood from the rotation, he went for Lilly and Marquis. And while Lilly has certainly done a great job, he's nothing more than a 3-4 type in the rotation, and Marquis is just a 5th starter, which is where you develop one of your own, rather than hand-cuff the team with a $7 million/yr 5th starter.

Furthermore, at that time, we still had prospects like Marshall, Pie, Cedeno, E. Patterson, etc., that could've netted us top-notch talent.

But knowing we needed OBP, he went for the "sexiest" signing in Soriano, and hand-cuffed the team for 8 years with his albatross of a contract with no-trade provisions to boot. Funny thing is, when you take a .330-type OBP guy, and pair him with another .330-type OBP guy (Jacque Jones), what did he think would happen?!?! It was a disaster, and we ended up giving Jones away practically, and when we needed an extra Outfielder to begin with, and Josh Hamilton was available, Hendry decided it was better to take a shot at an aging, broken down Cliff Floyd than it would be on a young, former top prospect with legit power, and 5 tool potential.

Ironically, the following year, Hendry realized they needed OBP, so what does he do?!? He goes out, and signs Fukudome, who hasn't had a single AB in MLB, hoping, praying that his OBP skills in Japan, translate to the US, which it did...for the first month, until advanced scouts figured him out.

Fact is, if Hendry is looking to go with Soto, Theriot, Fontenot, Soriano, ARAM, Hoffpauir, Fukudome, and others for the next 2-3 years, then he sure as hell better start selling high on some of these prospects, whose value might never be higher than it is now----guys like Harrison, Thomas, Robinson, Fox, Flaherty, etc. Because most of those guys are about 23-26 years old. If they're blocked for 3 years, it takes up their prime years in MLB, and in other team's minds, they just lost a HUGE amount of value.

It's why, while I didn't like the health of Harden, I still thought that was a pretty good deal for us, because we sold high on Murton, Patterson, Donaldson, and Gallagher. See, all of those guys were in the range I just mentioned. If we would've waited, they'd have lost significant value in other GM's eyes.

It's why we need to contact teams that have all but given up on this year like the Pirates, Astros, D'Backs, Mariners, A's, Orioles, Nationals, and Rockies, and see what it'd take to get:

Pirates: McLouth or Freddy Sanchez

'Stros: Sampson, Valverde, Keppinger, Oswalt, or Carlos Lee

D'Backs: Felipe Lopez, Doug Davis, or Tony Pena

M's: Ichiro, Balentien (though he sucks this year, we might get a buy low scenario on his potential), Bedard, Washburn, Batista, or Vargas

A's: Holliday, Cust, Kennedy, Cahill, Ziegler, Bailey, Casilla

O's: Markakis, Luke Scott, Baez, Sherrill

Nats: Dunn, Johnson, Guzman, Willingham, Villone, Bergmann

Rockies: Hawpe, Smith, Stewart or Atkins, Hammel, Jimenez, Cook, Morales, Flores, Street

As I mentioned last night, we just have to get rid of the likes of Cotts, Patton, Miles, Freel and possibly look to trade the likes of Gregg, Heilman, Fontenot, Soto, Johnson, Lee, etc., trying to turn over the roster of underperforming parts.

Soto's value might never be higher. Fontenot's surely was never higher than last year. We all know Soto will ALWAYS struggle with his fat, and his hand isn't getting better....time to sell high. Once/If Fontenot picks it back up again, we sell high on him, and we convince Lee that for the betterment of the team, he's got to go.

In the OF, Hendry's just going to have to bite the bullet and bench Bradley. We need to find a RF/CF then to replace him and Dunn, McLouth, Hawpe, and Holliday would be at the top of my list. Losing Freel, Miles, and Fontenot would mean we'd need someone like Felipe Lopez, Freddy Guzman or Christian Guzman, or Keppinger, and given the fact the D'Backs have 6 or 7 top picks this year in the first 3 rounds, I would venture a guess that they'd be willing to turn over a good portion of their roster.

The top relievers we should go after would be Pena, Street, Valverde, and Sherrill.

All 4 could replace the likes of Patton, Heilman, Cotts, and Gregg.

I know none of you wants to hear it, but it's time to talk fire sale.

The Brewers are one of the hottest teams in baseball right now, and the Cards are close behind them. Funny thing is, both have sustained substantial losses like Weeks and Hoffman (for a little while), and Carpenter and Ludwick, and they're still kicking our ass. Couple that with the fact the Reds are young and powerful, and have Cueto, Volquez, and Harang, and they'll also be difficult to surpass this year.

What an idiot Hendry is. Hardly any of you believed me during the offseason when I kept saying it....but man, it's undeniable now that he is completely, 100% responsible for our predicament right now. When you count on Dempster and Bradley coming off career years, trade your most versatile guy and possible team MVP, then trade your top pitching prospect for a bum that's never been consistent, and thrust that same idiot into the closer's role after he blew 9 saves last year.....you're looking for trouble.

It literally is almost like he thought Bradley and Miles would be the saviors of this offense, isn't it?!? He pegged Miles as the starter, but he sucked in ST, so Fontenot got the nod, and both have sucked thus far, and can't even hold DeRosa's jock strap. Bradley is a cancer, and is complaining like Jacque Jones did, and still couldn't back up his complaints with production. Was Hendry that mentally challenged that he couldn't see that one coming. I think we all did to a certain degree, though most of you were hoping and praying that you were wrong....well, you're not...He really is that bad, and there's a reason he's been with like 10 teams in his career. One, he was a cancer, and distraction, and two, he could never stay healthy enough to justify keeping his distracting behavior on the team.

Ugh...we never had any plans on keeping Hamilton at all, we purely obtained him for the Reds, that's all. Teams do that sometimes. Had we changed our minds and kept him, sure we might have a good right fielder, but we'd also have a GM no one would ever want to deal with, since he would've broken an unwritten GM code, so we'd be stuck with just about every bad player we traded away between us having Hamilton and now.

And as much as I want to agree with you on Hill, Pie, and Cedeno, he did get face value for all of them; problem is, their face value was close to nothing. In all honesty, I'm shocked they got Garrett Olsen for whichever one of Hill or Pie they got him for (of course, he went and packaged Olsen with Cedeno for Heilman, which wasn't the best deal). The problem, at least for Hill, since neither Pie or Cedeno has broken out for their new teams, is that the coaching staff can't develop young players. They can work out kinks for players with experience, but that's it. Meanwhile, there are plenty of other coaches who can develop young players into superstars. Unfortunately, we don't have any coaches like that.

Also, I don't think any of those teams you listed have "given up" on the season yet, especially since you mentioned the Pirates and, as of last night, they were just two wins away from overtaking us in the standings. I don't think any of those players will become available until at least June 25th...by then, we'll see if we're even in buyer mode. God help us if we aren't, because that could very well be the end of Theriot as a Cub.

Boseph,

I'm not quite sure I understand where you were going with that about Hamilton. First off, you're absolutely right....But that's not the argument, is it? We had the opportunity to select him, but rather than take a chance on a NEED we clearly had, we deferred, and selected him for the Reds. So, you're right, he would've broken a rule, but that's NOT the point....we should've selected him in the first place, because we had a need.

Second, as for the prospects, what I was merely stating was that Hendry didn't get the most out of them while their value was still high. Soto and Fontenot are good recent examples. Now, they probably have next to no value at all in trades compared to what we'd have got for them in the offseason. I know, I know....I'm technically breaking my own rule about prospects and giving them a chance. But what you might not realize is guys like Soto and Fontenot, based on their minor league stats, really were just lucky last year, and the league has caught up to them much like it did with Fukudome (though he had more holes in his swing than Soto and Fontenot combined). I did a statistical analysis maybe a week or so ago drawing conclusions about MLB player projections related to their minor league stats.

I'll summarize briefly. In general, if a minor league player cannot hit above .300 consistently during the course of a season on multiple levels, then he will not be above average as a major leaguer. However, if that player is above .300 on almost all of his minor league stops, and provided he's an everyday player (not just a bench guy), then he'll be a very solid major leaguer. I took all of the above average players that you think about in the league like Teixeira, Howard, Pujols, etc. , and if you look at the guys in MLB that are averaging 25-30 hr, 100 RBI, close to a .300 avg, etc., there's a 99% chance they hit above .300 during their minor league careers. Why?...because if you can hit at every level in the minors, then you sure as hell can hit MLB pitching. The game doesn't change...the competition does, but if you consistently hit, then you should have no problem putting it together in MLB.

That's precisely the players the Cubs should be going after. If I were Hendry and the scouting department, I'd look at nothing but AA hitters, and see where their progression was before. If in short season, low-A, and high-A, they were hitting over .300, and continued it in AA, then that's the type of consistency you're looking for, and you go after them.

As for teams "giving up". I do believe that all of those teams have essentially surrendered the season, aside from maybe the Astros (because McLane never wants to do so) and maybe the Pirates. The important thing to keep in mind, however, about the Pirates, is they're still a few years away, and they realize that. They'll look to trade the likes of Wilson, Adam LaRoche, Freddy Sanchez and any veteran pitching they might have. McLouth might be next to impossible to pull away from them, but they've finally got good leadership in their management, and they have a clear vision of what they want to do (unlike the Cubs)

But the entire basis of signing Hamilton is built completely on hindsight. It's like people saying "Man, we had Dontrelle Willis and we traded him? How could we trade an ace like that?" Hamilton hadn't produced, and for all intents and purposes, he could've wound up like Kris Benson.

Aaron,
While I agree with most of what you said, there is one thing that I disagree with. I am not sure if you were saying to trade Soto in the winter, but to say it now is a little bit of 20/20 hindsight. I don't think anyone saw this coming for him. He is off to a brutal start, but if he was traded over the winter and was having the same kind of year as he had last year, the city would be going nuts, especially when we really don't have a replacement to take over right now. I think he can still turn it around and hopefully next year he returns to form.

But I agree that the moves hendry made over the winter were absolutely brutal. I said it then and I still stick by it, so no monday morning QB'ing here.

I just don't understand what they are looking at when they sign guys like Miles and Gaithright...It only took them 1 month to figure out that Gaithright was horrible. I'm sure they now realize that Miles is horrible too, but HOW DO YOU NOT KNOW THAT BEFOREHAND ??? Are their scouts blind ? Do they see something else that we are not seeing ? Because I know that every cub fan will agree that we all hated those signings when they occured.... just like Jacque Jones, Jeromy Burnitz, etc in past years, ...Do they expect these players to perform differently from their track records ? I just don't get it.

Oh well, I think we are in for a long year. And when you look at what we have on the books as far as payroll over the next 2-3 years, you have to be worried.


unfortunately, I take no pleasure in saying this (because we're hurting now with him), but I warned against putting hopes in Soto after last season, and even said then to sell high. I agreed that he had a break out year, but the things that stood out to me were Blanco's comments about how he finally showed up in shape (which he didn't this year), and his hand coming off the bat last year, and him constantly shaking it.

So, yeah, there were signs, and I noticed them, as I'm sure other scouts did too. Look, they have our players absolutely down pat when it comes to pitching game plans.

Soriano-curve balls in the dirt outside, or up and out over the plate just above the letters
Fontenot-curveballs in the dirt, or up in the zone
Bradley-fastballs inside, up in the zone, and breaking balls in the dirt
Lee-inside to move him back, then away, away, away, and nothing but fastballs or sliders in the dirt away b/c of lack of bat speed

I could go on and on. I'm sure you guys could too. We watch just about every game. You think advanced scouts don't see this too? Our offense has been in a funk, because of 2 reasons.

#1: Hendry didn't sign consistent players in the first place
#2: Our hitters are very predictable, just as our relievers are when they're behind in the count, and have to throw a fastball right down the middle.

Speaking of Miles, my favorite player. Did anyone see that play last night where he went back to catch that floater ?? I know he was moving away from the infield, but that was NOT a hard play. It was only about 20-30 feet into the OF and it wasn't very high, and yet he barely got a glove on it.

So not only can't he hit his way out of a paper bag, he has no speed, a weak arm, and now he has trouble with easy little popups. Other than that, he's AROD. WTF.

And to think we signed this guy for 2 years for $5M (total).

JUST AMAZING.

Guys...where Hendry fails in that he attempts to assume that players, regardless of prior character or reputation, will turn it around playing in the friendly confines in front of passionate fans.

Texas, NY and Washington (especially Frank Robinson) knew of the personality (and performance)flaws of Soriano. And certainly ditto for Bradley (many more times over). These guys have such ego's that they can't and won't adapt to the game around them. How Soriano received his duration of contract is mind-boggling, and to a lesser degree is Bradley. And even Fukodome (an unproven commodity in the states) never should have received 4 years.

We can say all we want that this is what the market predicated, but the major flaw is no commitment to the farm system and willingness to play the kids. As has been quoted numerous times by many here, when the likes of Pie, Hill, Patterson quickly go from "untouchables" to bums, that doesn't say a lot for our coaching and scout staff at any level of the organization.

You look at Boston and they now have this "problem" of what to do with Clay Bucholz, who flirted with a no-hitter at AAA. But no spot for him with Smoltz returning soon. We should have such problems.

JH didn't realize the leadership void created with the departures of Edmonds, DeRosa and Wood. This current roster has no true leader, and Lou is now checked out as manager. That's why managers and players should never receive more than 2 year contracts (except for the ultimate and obvious superstars). It should all be based on consistent performance, not one-year wonders. Guys, you think about it...a $140m budget, and this is what we have to show for it...I think we all here on CCO would have made wiser off-season decisions the last few years (and not just playing hindsight).

If you try to sign guys to 2 year contracts, then I don't care how big of a budget you have, you're not signing anyone. Soriano wasn't going to sign for any less than 6 years. You try and sign him for two, he'll laugh at you as he signs a multi-million dollar deal that's slightly cheaper over 6 years than whatever 2 year contact you offer him. It's all about job security.

Older players know they won't get better with age, but they expect you to believe in them enough that they will get the job done in the first few years of the contract. So far, Soriano has done that. Without him, we wouldn't have made the playoffs the last two years. Heck, he's taking WALKS now, and other than these last two weeks, has been completely undeserving of this negativity thrown his way this season.

The same for Fukudome. Four years was a necessity. If you offered him less, he would've stayed in Japan, and, again, we wouldn't have made the playoffs last year.

Now, with Bradley, two years worked since there was the vesting option for three based on games played in 09. The problem is that the number of games needed is less than it should be. Any guy can play 75 games. It'd take a catastrophic injury not to. It should've been 100 games. Cause if you miss 60, it means you weren't healthy or a help to the team.

Actually, Fukodome refused more money/same years from the White Sox.
Re: Soriano...a six year deal I could have lived with...to age 37...eight years was just outrageous to age 39.
I believe Sammy's went to age 38 and he was insufferable (and juiced I might add.)
After THIS season...we still have 5 more years of Sori at lead-off only. If possible we should trade him to an AL team in need of a DH...but 18 mil for
5 years is a huge chunk for another team to swallow.
MB should produce more...and if he can
showcase enough...he also would benefit being back in the AL as a DH.

The only way the Cubs can be remade into
a true contender again...is if we off-load expensive guaranteed talent for young up and coming talent.

I don't mind sucking for a year or 2 if we are building a young true powerhouse...see Tampa...but add budget.
Sucking...with a huge payroll and older players with no direction...is the worst possible thing.

Soriano was a bad sign. Sure, he hits 30 HRs per year, and 70 RBI. But that's basically his only value. He can hit nowhere but leadoff. He swings for the fences every time, and he is the worst fielding LF in MLB. Other than that, he's worth his $138 million.

Funko was a bad sign, too. Last year was awful, and this year he looks better--so far--but he has little power. He isn't worth $50 million.

DLee isn't worth his contract; Z isn't worth his contract. Dempster isn't worth his $50+ million.

My point: JHendry doesn't have a good track record on the big contract signings.

Another thing, just look at all the dead salary we have this year. We actually acquired a couple of those guys and are now paying them to suck for other teams or in the minor leagues. Unbelievable.

Whether for 6 or 8 years, Soriano's deal is terrible. You could have gotten similar production/results with DeRosa for 1/4 the price tag, and with a better "team chemistry" associated.

What other organization would give an 8 year no-trade deal for 70 RBI's a year? C'mon guys...let's get real here.

Bryan, that has been, and will ALWAYS be my point against Hendry as GM. He misplays the market so many times, whether it be getting fair value in trade, or maximizing our farm system in trades while their value is high, and finally, with his free agent decisions. He might just be the worst free agent signer in baseball right now.

He totally miscalculated the market for Soriano, and especially with Bradley. Bradley was backed into a corner. NO team wanted him, and yet Hendry signed two guys, who, as mentioned have been less than stellar teammates, and equally confounding as consistent producers...he's totally handcuffed the team. You have to think about this for a second. We are literally stuck with an OF of Soriano, Fukudome, and Bradley for the next 3 years. All will be in their mid 30's, none are consistent performers, and they're average defenders. Really?!?!?!? Did Hendry even think that through?

Therefore, the only positions you could truly upgrade in are 2B, 1B, and C (assuming Soto continues to battle weight and hand problems).

Leave a comment

Latest from the Minors

GreatSeats.com
Cubs Tickets

for Home and Away Games




Cubs Rooftop Tickets
at Skybox on Sheffield


JustGreatTickets.com is the local source for
Cubs Tickets
MLB teams Tickets
Chicago Bulls Tickets
Bears Tickets
Blackhawks Tickets





What is Eamus Catuli

What is Eamus Catuli?
Lakeview Baseball Club


iPhone Apps featuring the CCO


Cubs iPhone Apps
FanMisery.com - Chicago Cubs

Cubs iPhone Apps
FanPulse - Chicago Cubs FanPulse - ChicagoCubsOnline


CCO Sponsors


Ticket Lodge
Discount Chicago Cubs Tickets
www.theticketlodge.com



References & Links







Subscribe in a reader

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Subscribe via email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


ChicagoCubsOnline Partner


CCO Twitter Updates



We Believe The Movie
The CCO We Believe The Movie Review




Shop WrigleyvilleSports.com Today!

Chicago Cubs Online - Featured On The Web Here

Chicago Cubs Online - one of Chicago's best blogs
Chicago Cubs Online - on Chicago Sun Times Chicago Cubs Online - on Sports Illustrated




ChicagoCubsOnline on YouTube