Is no movement the right move for the Cubs? Or is the pending ownership change having more effects on this off-season than anyone is letting on? In the Phil Rogers world of math equations the Cubs might have improved already this off-season but if there are winners and losers in the off-season, the Cubs are far from the leaders in the clubhouse.
Jim Hendry still appears to be on the trail of Milton Bradley and rumors persist that Jason Marquis is on the block. But as the New Year approaches and organizations close up shop for the Holidays, a very busy calendar year for the Cubs could end with less than a bang.
Jason Marquis
Ken Rosenthal reported on Friday the Rockies "are debating whether to sign free-agent right-hander Tim Redding or trade for Cubs righty Jason Marquis." The Rockies could be one of the other two teams Bruce Levine referred to earlier in the week. Levine reported the Mets were one of three teams that have called the Cubs about Jason Marquis.
Rosenthal pointed out the theme for the winter on Friday. The Cubs are "willing to assume a significant portion" of Marquis' $9.875 million salary for 2009.
Rich Harden, Ryan Dempster and the WBC
A report during the meetings pointed out Ryan Dempster would probably participate in the upcoming WBC with Team Canada...but fellow Countryman, Rich Harden was not mentioned at the time.
According to a report from the Toronto Sun on Friday, Justin Morneau is hopeful Team Canada will have Rich Harden on their roster. Morneau said it looks like Ryan Dempster "will be there".
Over the past two weeks, players have begun announcing their decision to either play for their country or sit out the tournament. Stay tuned....
Jim Hendry on Sports Central
The Cubs GM joined Dave Kaplan on Friday night and spent around 15 minutes talking Cubs baseball. In bullet point format, here are a few of the highlights:
- Hendry admitted the organization is going through a transition with the sale of the company. He added many teams are tightening their belt.
- Hendry said the Cubs are fortunate the payroll did not go down but with the transition they cannot necessarily add any guys they want.
- Hendry stuck to the fact the Cubs would prefer to add a left-handed bat or a switch hitter to the lineup.
- Mike Fontenot and Micah Hoffpauir did well from the left side last season and maybe they will find more opportunities for playing time next season.
- Hendry added that the Cubs have a lot of good players but they would prefer to add a left- hander or a switch hitter to the lineup. On a side note, whenever Hendry mentioned a left-handed bat during his conversation with Kaplan, he quickly added "or switch hitter" immediately after.
- Dave Kaplan asked Hendry about Jake Peavy or adding another starting pitcher. Hendry did not mention Peavy specifically by name and pointed out to Kaplan that he could not talk about other teams players.
- Hendry did explain the Peavy situation, again without mentioning his name, that the Cubs will always try to find ways to add elite guys, especially one that hand picks the Cubs. Hendry said he has to explore what it would take to add a player like that.
- The Cubs would "certainly love to have a starter" according to Hendry but the new owner would have to signoff on adding the contract.
- Hendry said the Cubs do not have a new owner yet....there was a change of tone when Hendry said the word "yet", he really emphasized the word, almost adding an exclamation point to the end of the sentence.
- Kaplan and Hendry discussed Greg Maddux. Hendry said the Cubs would welcome back Maddux in any capacity. He thinks Maddux belongs in the game and would be successful at any level, from GM to pitching coach. He said the door is always open for Maddux to return.
- Ryne Sandberg's promotion to Double-A was the next topic on the table. Hendry said the organizations philosophy is for their people to not get stuck on levels and where they are in the organization.
- Hendry said when Pat Listach left for the Washington Nationals the Cubs decided to reshuffle the organization.
- Sandberg had two very good years at Peoria and is moving at a very good pace. He thinks Sandberg is capable of managing in the big leagues down the road.
- Kerry Wood was next up. Hendry said Wood's deal with the Indians is very positive for Kerry....a good landing spot for Woody.
- Hendry has a history with Eric Wedge and other than the three games the Indians play the Cubs in 2009, Hendry will always root for Woody.
- Hendry called Kerry Wood "a special, special guy" and said he and Woody will always have a special relationship.
- Hendry called Joey Gathright a good signing. He said the Cubs are trying to get more left-handed and to add speed to the lineup.
- Hendry used the term "thunder and speed" and thinks Joey will have more of an impact in the National League than he did in the American League...especially with all of the double switches.
- Kaplan brought up the subject of Adam Dunn and revealed he asked his listeners to email questions they wanted him to ask Hendry during the interview. Kaplan received "about 30 emails" on Adam Dunn.
- Hendry likes Dunn, especially his power numbers. He called him an "on-base guy".
- The Cubs are not going to rule out adding anyone and sometimes an organization has to balance offense a player can add versus the defense that player might bring. Hendry did not specifically say, but the feeling was from his tone that Dunn does not fit in with what the Cubs need.
- The rumors surrounding Mark DeRosa at the meetings were discussed briefly. Hendry pointed out he never talks about his guys. He did say that nobody on the team is ever untouchable.
- Hendry finished with the fact the Cubs are trying to find guys to help them win games.
Stay tuned on the Adam Dunn front. He is telling people in Arizona he wants to play for the Cubs in "the worst way."
The interview by Dave Kaplan with Jim Hendry might not have revealed anything new but his tone, especially towards the pending ownership change was a little different than in recent weeks. Hendry seemed very matter of fact for the most part, with short answers except for when he discussed Ryne Sandberg, Greg Maddux and Kerry Wood.
Well, that's the latest....and I'm sticking to it!



















I for one am soo excited that Ryno is with the Smokies.
I've never met Sandberg so I can't wait for the Smokies to come in to town to play the Baybears.
My calendar is marked! ^^
I love hearing how players want to play for the Cubs. If they could somehow unload Soriano for quality i wouldn't mind if Adam Dunn played left field. No way do I want to see him in RF while Soriano plays LF.
Let me ask you (JimTP) and Joe something out of curiosity.
Both of you seem on the same page about Dunn. Yes to Dunn, only if Soriano can be unloaded.
Here is my question. Lets say we can't get Bradley or any of our other options. Would you take Dunn as opposed to no one. Or would you just continue to say no to Dunn and hope Hendry just goes with Fukudome in RF again.
Just curious.
Matt H:
That is one great question.(I would have to say no ) Of all the free agent OF options that are out there my preference is:
1: Abreau
2: Bradley
3: Ibanez (No longer a FA)
4: Dunn
As for players to be aquired in trades:
(Of course I would like to see Grady Sizemore or Nick Markakis but realistically I don't see them being traded).
1: DeJesus
2: Hawpe
3: Ethier
4: Winn
5: Hermedia
What would you do?
Excluding Dunn, because he is my top choice - my only other personal option from FA is Bradley because he is still young too.
I don't like Abreu because he is on the decline and will be 38 or 39 at the end of that contract.
I would kill for Hawpe but the Rox won't even consider it I'd think.
And Hermidia is young but unproven.
So I guess my realistic order would be:
Dunn
Bradley
Hermidia
Abreu
Unrealistically:
Brad Hawpe sits atop my ransom.
Matt H:
Whoever Hendry signs; I hope it is only for 2 years at the most.
Good night, talk to you tomorrow.
I think if we go for Bradley we can get a 2-year deal because of his injuries with perhaps a club option that automatically kicks if he reaches a certain amount of games played each of the two years. Probably get him on a two year 14-15 million dollar deal.
If we go for Abreu, we are probably talking 3 years and perhaps a fourth since at 35 this is his last chance at a decent free agent contract. He will cost us a bit more though, likely 3 years and 45-50 million. I don't see the Cubs spending that amount.
On further review....I would also encourage the Cubs to sign Abreu if they are willing to pay the money.
He seems to be good for 20+ Homeruns, and 40+ doubles along with a .300 batting average and he also, like Dunn, walks about 100 times a season. Plus, he could be someone to get D-Lee out of the number 3 spot as Abreu has primarily spent his career as a 3 hole hitter.
Do you think you get that production throughout the contract though?
Looking at his stats and age, I would think so. However, I just don't think we spend that kind of money on him. I'm not sure I would either. With in-house options, I take a flyer on Bradley before I go with Abreu.
I agree.
I'm not anti-Abreu. Whenever you hand an above average contract to someone over 35 you have to be a little concerned.
But if a little bird promised me Abreu would be Abreu throughout the contract he'd be the guy I'd want.
In fact Fukudome was supposed to be our Abreu.
Hit .300 and get on base around .380 with 15 plus HRs.
I just don't know that I would spend that kind of money and not take a flyer on Bradley first. I like Abreu, but financially I have to look at other options.
I also would HOPE that Fukudome bounces back. And of course good ol Hoffpuair should get a shot!
I do not want Dunn under any condition. I think unloading Soriano for Dunn is crazy. As I stated on previous posts, we can essentially say that the power is the same for both of them. Where Soriano stands head and shoulders above him is the ability to hit for higher average and ability for speed, and the ability to throw runners out with his cannon arm.
I am completely against unloading Soriano (though I do support moving him out of leadoff spot). And completely against signing Dunn.
If I had moy choice for things I would consider many in house choices.
1) Fukudome if he can bounce back. Sure would like his great defense and arm out in RF if he can bounce back.
2) Hoffpauir would be my choice. Put him out there and spirng training and see what he can do. I don't think he'd be that bad. Is DeRosa any better? Lou didnt seem to mind him out there.
3) DeRosa in RF and Fontenot at 2B.
If I had to sign a free agents, I would certainly consider Bradley if he doesn't break the bank. Certainly worth a flyer.
Jim (TP),
I hope you don't mind me weighing on on this conversation...
Even with Soriano, I am convinced that Dunn is the best option for us. I know, I know...his defense is bad, his average is bad, blah, blah blah. However, your preferences are slightly flawed. Abreu's price tag is insanely high, and considering he is 6 years older than Dunn, I wouldn't touch him. While he does have more SB's than Dunn, and a better average, he has 18 hr less on average, about the same OBP, and about the same RBI. He averages less walks, and about 30-40 less K's than Dunn.
As for Bradley, I was happy with it after thoughtful consideration, but I think that had a lot to do with hearing the Cubs were interested in him, so I just figured it was inevitable, and I'd have to warm to the idea, much like I had to with Soriano when I didn't really think it was wise to give him that many years at that much money, but I was just happy their was action, which clouded my better judgement, much like it was recently with Bradley. I keep coming back to Bradley's full seasons and games played: 98, 101, 141, 75 96, 61, 126.
Now, Bradley would cost you 3-4 years at $10-12 million per year. Now, we all know that your 1-3 starters, set-up man, and closer, are absolutely vital to your team. Hendry decided against locking up one of the better closers in the game last year because of his injury history, and he couldn't take that risk and spend that much on one position like that. Considering he used that judgement to make that decision, how in the world can he possibly sign a fragile mentally AND physically guy like Bradley for the same type of money (but more years) than he would've had to give to Wood (in the process, Hendry made the team weaker by trading Ceda for a woeful Gregg). How is that a good decision?
Abreu: 151, 152, 154, 162, 157, 158, 159, 162, 156, 158, 156
Dunn: 158, 116, 161, 160, 160, 152, 158
If you're hedging your bets, you have to go with Abreu or Dunn, and given the years Abreu would want, along with average salary, there's no way you go for him, especially with a much younger and powerful Dunn available.
Now, you look at peripherals, and you can see that both absolutely DOMINATE at Wrigley, but Abreu hits very well against lefties, and better with RISP (now, a lot of that has to do with the amount of walks that Dunn takes, etc.). So, based on that, you go with Abreu, but like I said, you have to weigh age, historical stats, and potential. Do you think Dunn could be even better with Gerald Perry? I would think so. Do I think Abreu will get better? Possibly for one year, but you can see nearly all of his numbers steadily declining over the last 3-5 years, which is quite alarming.
As for your trade ideas, I'd only take Hawpe out of any of those guys. I originally thought DeJesus would be great, but he's nothing more than a non-versatile, faster and lefty version of DeRosa (meaning, at best, he'll give you what DeRosa gave last year....at his very best, otherwise, you're looking at .280 avg, .345-.350 OBP, 15 hr, 70 RBI) Hawpe plays equally as well away from Coors, and he hits pretty damn well with RISP. He struggles though against lefties to the tune of about a .247 avg and .314 OBP.
Ethier might offer the best upside of anyone on your list, but the only way he gets traded is in a deal for Soriano, ARAM, or Zambrano, and there's no way we're trading ARAM or Z. Hermida would be nice as a sort of project with decent upside, but I wouldn't give up much for him, and the Marlins would probably want too much than he's worth.
As I've said before, if the Angels lose out on their top targets, I'd be on the phone with them right away to see what they wanted for Figgins. If they'd take on Soriano, then I'd do a swap of Soriano for Figgins and Brandon Wood or Sean Rodriguez, but a lot depends on where Manny and Teixeira land. After that, I'd be on the phone with MacFailed to see what they'd need for Roberts. I am 100% convinced that having both Figgins and Roberts would push us over the top. They offer versatility and speed, which is what we need. We need to capitalize on the values of Lilly and DeRosa right now, as well, and try to get the most for them while their value might be at an all-time high. Both are at/near the end of their contracts, so they might be an attractive chip to some teams.
If you trade Lilly, you open a spot for Guzman or Samardzija. Maybe then, you can even go after Peavy. After offloading Marquis, you extend a one year offer to Randy Johnson, and we're pretty much set.
But, to me, the last people I'd want on the team next year (that we have now, or have been linked to) are Bradley, Ibanez (thankfully he already signed), Gathright, Fukudome (because he's a distraction now, and will be all of next year unless he can make adjustments---unlikely), and Marquis.
If you think about the profile that Lou wants, it's consistency. Bradley is wildly inconsistent because of his injuries. Gathright is neither, because he's done NOTHING at all to show he even belongs at the MLB level, and he, unlike Pie, has actually had the opportunity to prove himself. Fukudome was inconsistent because he was amazing the first two months, then the league figured him out, and he looked like a lost puppy at the plate. As for Marquis, he'll throw a 1-2 hitter, then get shelled and driven out of the next game in the 3rd or 4th inning.
Guys like Abreu, Dunn, Ethier, and Hawpe might be Piniella-type guys. Guys we alreay have like ARAM, Lee, DeRosa, Soto, and Theriot were also Piniella-type guys, because they exemplified consistency. None of those guys went in prolonged funks at all like we'd see from Soriano, Edmonds, Fukudome, and others. You could tell that Soriano was wearing thin on Piniella at the beginning of the year, and toward the end as well. He's the most streaky hitter in the game.
We've seen guys like Ward, Edmonds, Wood, Marquis, and others either being let go, or on the trading block because he didn't like their inconsistencies. With Wood, hewas flabbergasted more by the blister than inconsistencies, but you get what I'm saying? So, if I were to look at the next guy to be traded that doesn't fit a Piniella-type guy, then it would be Soriano.
I think Piniella is a big fan of OBP, which is why he's had Perry with him, who preaches that. I think you will see guys that don't fit that description weeded out as long as he's managing the team, which is good for us. I believe our increase in OBP is precisely the reason we had so many wins last year. Just look at the guys we've been linked to, and their OBP rankings at their positions. Dunn, Bradley, and Abreu are all .370-.400 OBP-capable guys. Roberts also has a very high OBP among his peers at his position. Giles has a high OBP as well. This is very exciting to finally see that they've grasped this....
which is why the signing of Soriano is most perplexing, and definitely makes him stand out as the probable next guy to be traded.
Here's numbers from last year, plus career:
Soriano-.344 OBP (.329 OBP career)
Theriot-.387 OBP (.363 OBP career)
Lee-.361 OBP (.367 OBP career)
ARAM-.380 OBP (.341 OBP career)
Edmonds-.343 OBP (.377 OBP career,39yrs old)
Soto-.364 OBP (N/A)
DeRosa-.376 OBP (.348 OBP career)
Fukudome-.359 OBP (N/A)
Now, you look at all those numbers, and what's not shown is Fukudome's woeful numbers, including OBP at the end of the year, and in Edmond's case, he'll likely retire. Additionally, ARAM's numbers were skewed because he had no coaching with the Pirates, and his OBP dramatically improved with the Cubs, and he became more selective, plus, he was older, at 25 when he came to us.
Now, Soriano's number from last year, as well as his career OBP average sticks out like a sore thumb in relation to the rest of our lineup.
This also makes the signing of Gathright particularly confusing. Maybe Piniella see in him an opportunity to coach him into patience, and thus, a higher OBP, who knows?
Look at guys we got rid of/looking to get rid of: Pie, Eric Patterson, and Cedeno. These are all guys that have low OBP's. Now, someone mentioned Gathright's OBP vs Pie's OBP in the minors----perhaps this is why we got him,because Piniella was familiar with him, and knows how to fix him, who knows?
Question, you said above: "Now, you look at peripherals, and you can see that both absolutely DOMINATE at Wrigley"
While I can see how that would relate to Abreu, as he hit .352 with 12 HR's in 29 games for his career at Wrigley.....I don't see how you can say that Dunn absolutely DOMINATED anything. His career numbers at Wrigley are .286 with 23 HR's in 60 games.
While the HR numbers are decent, and they are identical between the two based on games played....the batting averages are far different. I wouldnt consider a .286 average dominating anything.
Dude Joe S., are you serious?
Dunn would be amazing at Wrigley field. Yeah, his defense is suspect, but what he does with the bat to the tune of 45+ HR and 115+ RBI would more than makeup for it.
The fact that you use batting average as your main sticking point shows the flaw in your argument. BA is a horrible statistic to correlate for offensive contribution. If you're going to use stats, at least use a half decent one like OPS or OBP..oh wait..Dunn's OBP is somewhere in the range of .380+. -_-;
Actually it seems my thought against Dunn is the prevailing thought here.
How can you say my thought on batting average is flawed? The fact with Dunn is yes he will hit about 40-45 homeruns...but thats all we will get from him. Great he walks 100 times...as someone else said here below thats not what you pay your big bopper to do. His crappy batting average will suck when we just need him to come through with a base hit to tie the game with a runner in scoring position. Or if we are down by three with men on and the other team brings in a lefty which his average sucks against. So, I dont think his crappy batting average is something to ignore.
Interesting baseball news.....former Giants first baseman Lance Niekro who really only had minimal impact in 2005 and 2006 and retired last year. is attempting to comeback in the minor leagues with the Braves. Why is it notable?
Because he is going to try to follow in the footsteps of his late father Joe Niekro and his Uncle Phil Neikro and become a knuckleball pitcher in the majors.
A lot of the time (but not always), "stats don't lie". That's true of statements too. JH said (above): We're lucky that (budgeted) payroll didn't go down. And he also said/implied, "A new owner has to approve a big, new contract."
I take the above to mean that JH has little unspent budget left and that he really does have to move Marquis (or someone) to add a Bradley. That means that Abreu is more out of reach (unless an appropriate contract is moved.
Marquis seems to have some appeal for the Mets and the Rockies--in some sort of subsidized deal. Ten game winners who mostly aren't embarassing do have value. (My adopted son, Seth Smith, told me in his Christmas card that he has his fingers crossed.) So maybe JH finds payroll dollars in a Marquis move.
And the stats say that we do have the inexpensive lefty bat/right fielder solution available in Eric Hinske (.263-19-55 against right handers. The 31 yearold Hinske can also play 1B and 3B. He made $800,000 last year. Platooning with DeRo that probably means 25 HR's in RF.
While we don't need both DeRo and Ty Wigginton, if a trade of DeRo (not being recommended) gets us another important piece, Wigginton makes a lot of sense. Wigginton (31) hit .340 with a .424 OBP against left handers last season and was .285-23-58 overall. He is primarily a third baseman but plays the corner outfield positions decently. He also plays 1B and 2B. He made $4.3 mil last year and probably will cost about $6 mil now. For a "paltry" $7.5 mil, we might get both Hinske and Wigginton--while Bradley will probably cost about $9 mil.
I live in Indianapolis, and thus got to see a lot of Adam Dunn... and I wouldn't want him on the Cubs at all.
He hits home runs, but he doesn't really drive in runs. Meaning, most of those HR's are with nobody on base! I know it's trendy to salivate over his OBP, but you pay a guy like Dunn to drive in runs, not walk. His downside isn't just his defense, it's his K's, BA, and lack of RBI's. And his lack of D would REALLY show up in the Wrigley OF.
That aside, does anyone have a link to that Kaplan interview with Hendry? I'd love to listen to that.
What about asking about Ichiro. He could leadoff play RF and help Fukudome. Plays evergame. A lock for 200+ hits. About 10 HR's, 50 RBI's, a 380 OBP. I wonder if they would trade him and what it would cost. Don't know if the Cubs could afford him but it would fill both holes.
Does anyone know when tickets go on sale in the majors?
cookachoo....As good as the posts are, I'm hoping that Neil doesn't put a "stop" on your and my consecutive posts from Indy. About Dunn, as the spouse says when asked, How's your spouse, "Better than nothing."
Soriano brings more to the table than Dunn, and we don't have room for both of them in the outfield. Unless, maybe the thought of that gets Dome to say, "I'm going back to Japan." I'm not obsessed with Hinske (if we need an inexpensive option), but a platoon of Hinske and DeRo would be more productive in RF than Dunn.
Low batting average... all or nothing when he connects.... is Adam Dunn perhaps related to Dave Kingman? Like a nephew or something? :-)
That's exactly who I think of when I think of Dunn....Good 'Ol King Kong....the .236 career hitter himself. The only difference is that Dunn does walk more than Kingman did.
I was going to say Keith Moreland because of the fielding - but Kingman seemed a better comparison... maybe Dunn is some sort of Moreland/Kingman DNA-mixed clone or something.
Nahhh....you can't put zonk in the mix of things. Moreland, though not great defensively, at least knew what a .300 batting average was....having hit that mark twice with us. He also only struck out a high of 73 times. Moreland isn't part of the Dunn/Kingman mix.
joe- sorry but A) Lilly isn't going anywhere becasue he is our numer two, B) Guzman is going into the bullpen becasue of injuries (think wood last two years) and C) We can't even get one great player likle peavy how are we going to get both Roberts and Figgins without completly giving up the farm and hurting our current team.
What about a Vernon Wells/ Soriano swap salaries are about hte same and wells is a centerfielder that is an average to above average fielder and younger. Then we could sign Dunn or Abreu and platoon Reed/Fukudome/Hoffpuer/Derosa in right with kosuke and reed helping in left as a late inning def. replacement
Jim, I am die-hard Ichiro fan. He's one of the most disciplined hitters in the game. He plays a stellar right field. He rarely strikes out for the number of AB's he racks up per season. And maybe he and fuk can become friends.
Here's another reason I like Dunn. If Soriano would ever move out of the leadoff spot, then you can have Lee batting 3rd, Dunn batting 4th, Ramirez batting 5th, and Soriano batting 6th. This combination is going to wreak havoc on opposing teams trying to figure out pitching matchups. No manager in their right mind is going to leave a right handed pitcher to face Dunn in late innings, especially if Theriot or Lee can get on ahead of him. Judging by Dunn's stats, he either strikes out, walks, or hits a HR. Needless to say, he only grounded into 7 double plays last year. Far better than Derrek Lee's 27 GIDP. So that brings up Ramirez, Soriano, Soto... all potent right-handed hitters. The manager is going to have to dig deeper into his bullpen to pull out ANOTHER right-handed reliever to face these guys. Having Dunn in the lineup is like having Juan Pierre on the bases in late innings. It wreaks havoc to opposing teams in ways statistics can't be used.
How about Adam Dunn - Mark McGwire as a comparison???
Big news guys...apparently one team finally wised up to Bore-ASS and his shennanigans.
The Angels have decided to pull the plug on Teixeira negotiations, because, as their owner said, Bore-ASS is using them to drive up the price. Evidently, Moreno learned that Teixeira had no intentions of re-signing, and were just using them to get the Yankees and BoSox to bid higher.
It sure seems like the BoSox will win the bid at this point, as the O's, Angels, and Yankees have all reportedly pulled the plug, and the Nationals' front office said they DEFINITELY expect him to turn down their offer.
With Manny apparently not a Scioscia type of guy, I doubt he'll sign with Anaheim, so that leaves the Yankees and Dodgers as landing spots for him.
Which brings me back to my previous posts....
1)Lee, Soriano, and DeRosa are prime candidates to be traded to the Angels
2)Marquis will end up being traded to the loser of the Tim Redding sweepstakes.
3)We will then trade for Peavy if we can offload two of the above players.
The Angels will be in need of a firstbaseman if reports are indeed true that they've ended negotiations with Teixeira. I believe Lee could be traded straight up for Figgins in that case. If they ask, we could make a HUGE blockbuster with Lee AND Soriano, but the day that type of trade happens is the day hell freezes over, LOL.
If Soriano is traded, Lee is going nowhere, and vice-versa. Honestly, I'd MUCH rather trade Soriano than Lee, even though Lee was my whooping boy this year...Lee's OBP is much higher, and he makes more contact than Soriano, though, Soriano has proven that he can literally carry a team on his back during stretches.
But, as it stands right now, I believe they'll at least call the Cubs on Lee, and if I were Hendry, I'd listen carefully, ask for Figgins...maybe even another minor leaguer, insert Hoffpauir at 1B, and IMMEDIATELY sign Adam Dunn. The reason you do that, is because as much as we all think Hoffpauir will succeed, Dunn is a proven guy that will, at the very least, replace Lee's numbers, while Hoffpauir might flame out, who knows? With Figgins, we gain flexibility, as I've mentioned before, to throw him at 2B, SS, 3B, or the OF, and it makes DeRosa expendable so we can insert Fontenot at 2B.
I think once Teixeira signs, we'll see a FLURRY of deals, and I hope Hendry throws our hat into those deals.
Greetings faithful, long time no posting... I think I'm finally ready to put the disapointment that was 2008 behind me and get prepared for circa 09.
I’m anticipating a big 15 days of MLB transactions.
Angels are supposedly pulling out of the Tex bidding so a Tex deal should come soon per the experts (Sox/Yanks). I expect this will open the gates for signings such as Manny, Abreu, Bradley, Dunn, Burrell, Giambi, etc.
Still not sure which RF I prefer but I think the decision will be made soon. Hopefully JH is ready to pull the trigger and we don't end up with Garret Anderson.
I too think the Angels' reported dropping out on Tex is interesting. I hope both Moreno's calling it quits and Henry's similar action with the Red Sox are true--for the good of the game we love.
Without Tex, the Angels will need a lefty bat desparately. Dunn could find a home where he could DH as well as defend on occasion. Maybe the Angels get Kotchman back from the Braves (where he didn't do as well as in L.A.) in a trade that includes Brandon Wood. Wood doesn't lead off (like Furcal might have), but he could play 3B with Chipper returning to LF.
I don't see DLee going anywhere. The Angels would likely opt for a lesser left-handed hitting first baseman than for Lee. As an aside, Scoscia said the other day that Manny could fit with the Angels--so don't rule that out or the Yankees/Dodgers.
As another aside, I don't think Figgins, though versatile with excellent speed, helps us as much as some think. He was .276-1-22 with 34 SB's last season. He would likely play SS for us since he doesn't have enough bat for the OF. That would be a little better production than Theriot--but not enough to not spend the bucks elsewhere where we need more help. Our new "gene pool" could still be limited to the possibles like Bradley, Hinske and Teahen and the likely too pricey Abreu.
I tend to agree with Elliot to some extent about Dunn. I think Pinella would like to throw a hitter like Dunn into the lineup for the sole reason of being able to force the hand of other managers like Lou has been saying for a while we need the ability to do. Yes he is horrible against left-handed hitting which is exactly why any manager in a late close game would throw out a lefty releiver against him. Depending on the situation Lou can leave him in and set up the right handers behind Dunn or like he did many times in the past pinch-hit for Dunn after the pitching switch has been made. Either way it forces the opponent to go through their relievers much faster. It's just unfortunate that we are trying to fill the same hole as last year when we signed Fukudome.