Exploring the Possibilities

Vote 0 Votes

As the Winter Meetings approach Jim Hendry has a few questions surrounding his team. The Cubs have been relatively quiet so far this off-season with the only major move being the trade of Jacque Jones. Several reports out of Chicago have mentioned what the Cubs could be up to, but what does Jim Hendry have up his sleeve? How can he make Lou Piniella's crew better than the team that last took the field almost two months ago?

This week, in a two-part article, the CCO will take a look at several players the Cubs have been rumored to be interested in this off-season, as well as a few players on the 40-man roster. Here is part one....

Kerry Wood

Will the Cubs be able to resign their former ace? Wood's miraculous recovery at the end of last season has made him a hot commodity on the open market. Wood appeared in 22 games and was 1-1 with a 3.33 ERA and a 1.27 WHIP while holding opponents to a .207 batting average. Wood struck out 24 and walked 13 in 24 1/3 innings. His most impressive outing came in the last week of the season in Florida against the Marlins. In his last few outings Wood threw an upper 90's fastball on a consistent basis.

The Red Sox are rumored to be very interested, even the Cubs' rivals to the north have reportedly contacted Wood's agent. Will the Houston Astros or the Texas Rangers be in the bidding war for Wood? Wood reportedly was seeking a 2-year deal in the $10 million dollar range, but the recent signings of Francisco Cordero and Scott Linebrink figure to make Wood a little more than $5 million a year. The Cubs are rumored to be offering a 1-year incentive laden deal with an option for a second year....will that be enough to keep 'Kid K' in blue pinstripes or will the oft injured pitcher be better suited to reinvent himself in another city?

Several in Chicago's mainstream media thinks it is unlikely Wood will resign with the Cubs.

Kosuke Fukudome

Several reports have indicated the Cubs are very interested in signing the Japanese star. Fukudome is scheduled to meet with his U.S. agents at Octagon on November 29th but a report out of Japan last week indicated Fukudome might not make a decision until around the first of the year. Fukudome is weighing his options on whether he should stay in Japan or make the move to the Major Leagues. One report indicated there is a 50-50 chance he will make a change.

Fukudome fits the description of the type of player Lou Piniella is looking for to man right field next season and beyond. From all of the scouting reports, Fukudome is a very good defender with a strong arm, very patient at the plate with enough power to project him hitting between 25-30 home runs a year in the majors, some have said he would be a good number two hitter in most lineups.

Have the Cubs put all of their 'eggs' in the Fukudome basket like they did with Rafael Furcal a couple of years ago? If the Cubs are not able to land Fukudome does Jim Hendry have a back-up plan?

Matt Murton

When Matt Murton was sent down to Triple-A last season his future with the Cubs immediately came into question. Murton has a lot of potential but how does he fit into the Cubs' future plans? Murton looks out of place in right field and does not fit the description of an "athletic outfielder" that Piniella is looking for. Murton did an adequate job in left field in 2006 but with Alfonso Soriano patrolling left field for the foreseeable future, would the Cubs be better off trading Murton while he still has value?

Murton hit just .281 with 8 home runs and 22 RBI's and still had a good OBP of .352. But his numbers were down across the board in 2007 after playing in 144 games the year before. Murton's line in 2006 was .297/.365/.444/.809 with 13 home runs and 62 RBI's. Murton was one of the few Cubs to hit left handed pitching on a regular basis (.319/.386/.505/.892/3/9 in 48 games, 91 at bats) but if Jim Hendry can find a left-handed hitter that can hit southpaws, Murton becomes very expendable.

Jason Marquis

Jason Marquis had an inconsistent first season with the Cubs to say the least (12-9 with a 4.60 ERA with a 1.37 WHIP). At times he was a solid starter (2-1 with a 3.38 ERA in 6 starts in May with a 1.05 WHIP) but he faded down the stretch (2-1 with a 6.21 ERA in 6 starts, 7 games, in September with a 1.56 WHIP....second highest ERA of any month, 6.29 in July....second highest WHIP of any month, 1.70 in June) and appeared to fall out of favor with Lou Piniella. Marquis' ineffectiveness in the last month led to the Cubs not being able to depend on him in the playoffs and left Piniella with only three starters, he felt, in October.

Marquis' worst enemy appears to be himself but he is an "innings eater" (191 2/3 innings in 2007, his lowest since 2004....averaged a little under 199 innings in the last 4 seasons) and will take the ball every 5th day. Piniella said the Cubs must work with Marquis to improve on his second half performance next season....Marquis was 6-5 with a 3.67 ERA in 18 starts in the first half with a 1.26 WHIP while in the second half he was 6-4 with a 5.73 ERA in 15 starts, 16 games, with a 1.54 WHIP. With the ever-increasing cost of free agent pitching and the lack of quality arms on the market, could the Cubs move Marquis, in a package, with a relatively low salary for the next two years? The Cubs owe Marquis $6.375 million in 2008 and $9.875 million in 2009. Or would the Cubs be in better shape keeping Marquis and figuring out his second half struggles?

Ryan Dempster

The Cubs announced Ryan Dempster would compete for a spot in the starting rotation once Spring Training gets underway at Fitch Park in February. Dempster was once an All-Star starter but was very ineffective in that role in 2005 before switching to the club's closer. Is there room in a starting rotation that includes Dempster and Jason Marquis?

Lou Piniella reportedly was toying with the idea of putting Dempster back in the starting rotation in May when the bullpen was struggling. The thought was the Cubs wanted Angel Guzman to become the closer but Guzman suffered another arm injury and ended up having Tommy John surgery, thus ending his 2007 and 2008 seasons. Carlos Marmol came on and was dominant after his call-up....he even earned a vote in the NL MVP balloting. Bobby Howry was effective and Scott Eyre had a great second half once Piniella forgot his name....Stevie Ire.

Piniella likes hard throwers at the back end of the bullpen (for a good example see the Nasty Boys circa 1990) and while Dempster was effective (28 saves in 31 chances) he struggles with throwing strikes, walks too many batters (30 in 66 2/3 innings), gives up too many hits (59) and while his ERA might not tell the whole story, a 1.34 WHIP does say a lot. Dempster gave up almost 11 hits (10.69) per 9 innings in the second half while walking 4.50 per 9 innings....a .297 opponents' batting average, a .377 opponents' OBP and a 1.69 WHIP.

Could Dempster return to the form that saw him post solid numbers with the Marlins in 2000 (14-10 with a 366 ERA in 33 starts with 2 complete games, 209 strikeouts and a 1.36 WHIP) or in 2001 (15-12 with a 4.94 ERA with 2 complete games, 171 strikeouts and a 1.56 WHIP)? Or was the announcement of Dempster returning to the starting rotation a way for Jim Hendry to make him look more attractive to another team? Dempster's owed only $5.5 million in the final year of his contract....very cheap in today's market.

Kaz Matsui

The Cubs are looking at signing Kaz Matsui....at least that is what is coming out of both the Chicago and Denver mainstream media outlets. The Denver Post and the Houston Chronicle said the Astros were close to signing Matsui a week ago, then a report late last week in the Post suggested Matsui will sign with either the Cubs or the Astros this week. Matsui has reportedly turned down a 2-year offer from the Rockies and has his eyes set on signing a 3-year deal. Jim Hendry and Ed Wade (Astros' GM) both met with Matsui last week in Los Angeles, but nothing has come out of those meetings.

How would Matsui fit in with the Cubs? Some in the mainstream have stated Matsui will play at short when Mark DeRosa is at second and would fill in at second when DeRosa is either at third base or in right field. But a look at Matsui's numbers, especially at Wrigley, shows Jim Hendry should reconsider signing Matsui to a contract, much less a 3-year deal....

Last season with the Rockies was by far the best of Matsui's Major League career. He hit .288 with a .342 OBP, a .405 SLG and a .746 OPS in 104 games. The most games Matsui has played in a single season were 114 in 2004....his first year with the Mets.

The concerning offensive numbers on Matsui are his home-road splits. In 2006 he hit just .200 with a .235 OBP in 38 games with the Mets before being traded to the Rockies for Eli Marrero on June 9th. Matsui then hit .345 with a .392 OBP in 32 games for the Rockies. Last season Matsui hit .330 with a .381 OBP, a .482 SLG and a .864 OPS in 49 games at Coors Field. In 55 games on the road....Matsui hit .249 with a .304 OBP and a .333 SLG with a .638 OPS. All 4 of his home runs were hit at Coors Field. In 11 career games at Wrigley, Matsui has a .262 average (11-for-42) with a .295 OBP, a .476 SLG and a .772 OPS....a double, a triple and 2 home runs.

Are the Cubs looking at Kaz Matsui as a way to lure Kosuke Fukudome to the North Side, as some in the mainstream media have speculated? Or are they looking at Matsui to add a left-handed bat (Matsui is a switch hitter) to a right-handed dominated lineup? The Cubs need speed in their lineup and a few dependable left handed bats....but what did Juan Pierre once say? "You can't steal first base."

Part Two will take a look at Felix Pie, Sam Fuld, Ryan Theriot, Mark DeRosa, Carl Crawford, Ryan Church, Mark Prior and a name from the past....

  • slamdog

    Barry I'll agree on your evaluation of the Red Sox, Yankees,and the Dodgers. Im sure the 3 orgs wont be giving up some of those players. In the Mets case, I think they are overated, especially Milledge, Pelfrey and especially Humber who I think is very overated, the Cubs have a better overall package than the Mets.

  • brandon

    I agree with kevin. we would have to trade players the twins would actually want...ronnie cedeno does not classify. I would trade hill, derosa, gallagher, marshall for Santana. We would have to sign fukudome, and start pie everyday in center. then a matsui/patterson platoon at 2nd.

  • Kevin I

    Though I read this site daily I tend to leave the witty banter to my friend Jim (Tinley Park). I feel as though we are reading the same scenario with different twists everyday. Let's assume we all could part with the usual suspects: Cedeno, Murton, Pie, Patterson, Fontenot, Marquis, Dempster, Ohman (Please), Samardzija , Weurtz, etc. I just named 25% of our 40 man roster and could probably name another 20 guys (Cotts, Guzman, Pagan) before it started to hurt! The bottom line is unless he's a problem (wife beater, drugs, armed robbery, fill in the blank) Santana will not be had for any combination of those 30 guys....including Theriot! If we want him it's going to cost us!

    Let's look at the top ten in my opinion:

    Soriano- not going anywhere

    Aram

    Lee

    Z- not going anywhere

    Lilly

    Hill

    Marmol

    Wood

    Derosa

    Soto

    Tied for 11th:

    Howry/Gallagher/Hart/Marshall

    We want to part with 1 of the top 10 and 2 of the 11's they might listen. Bye the Bye Theriot is probably #15 on my list...a throw in!

    Just a few of my thoughts...thanks Jim.

  • BD

    Thank you to Kerry Wood for making me believe there is still some loyalty left in baseball. Kudos’ to Jim Hendry and his staff for getting this deal done!



    I think the Cubs need to go out and make a deal for Crawford, if it's still possible. Fukudome has had a great career in Japan and looks to be exactly what the Cubs need, but it is a risky expenditure given that no one knows how he will adjust to the major league level. We are only a few pieces away, and I think a trade for Crawford would go a long way to fulfilling our championship aspirations. Now who we give up to get him is beyond me, I just don’t think putting all our hopes on an unproven player like Fukudome is the answer. A prime example being the hype that revolved around Matsui, and his short tenure with the Mets...

  • Barry

    Gentlemen,

    I was thinking about the following package:



    Pie, Cedeno, Smardja and I know I'll catch flack for this but Theriot



    Look, we are all split on Theriot but the truth is he had a very respectable year last year minus the last two months. He is a gritty, versatile player. Eckstein like.



    My thinking is just this simple, the time is NOW!! You weight the costs of the future on today!! Players love Wrigley and we need to make this a destination of choice to all elite players to desire. We can be that storied franchise if we make the necessary hard decisions now. We have the skipper and the enthusiasm that change is here!!! Let's do it now!!! I have been watching semi-spectacular deals for 30 yrs!!!



    We can always build our Farm back up again...... If you lock up Santana for six years we have quite the longevity of flat out ALL STARS!!!



    am I nuts??

  • Neil

    David and Uncle Gerry....nope and nope

  • Gary J

    ...and I'd HATE for the Yankees to get him - if it can't be the Cubs then ANYONE but the Yankees

  • daverj

    Barry,



    Maybe we could work out the payroll issues, but there's no chance we could package enough talent to compete with the offers that other interested teams could put together. If he's dealt, it will likely be to the Yankees or Mets (or less likely but possibly, the Dodgers or Red Sox) for a package or 3-4 prospects including some of the following:



    Yanks - Chamberlain, Hughes, Kennedy, Cabrera, Jackson



    Mets - Milledge, Gomez, Martinez, Pelfry, Humber



    Dodgers - Kemp, Loney, LaRoche, Kershaw, Meleon, Hu



    Red Sox - Buchholz, Lester, Elsbury



    We don't have young talent of that caliber in our organization.

  • Gary J

    Barry - I think our pockets are deep enough for the contract he's going to want, but I doubt we've got the players other teams would throw in a deal to the Twins if the names I hear being bandied about are indeed what they can expect to get in return. I hope I'm wrong though because whichever team gets him becomes enormously better in a hurry, and I'd love that team to be the Cubbies.



    It's a good day when Woody resigns AND I get to use the word bandied :-)

  • cliff

    RE: Barry on Santana



    I would have said hell NO we didn't have a chance until I read recently on ESPN that the Twins were wanting PHIL HUGHES/MELKY CABRERA/AUSTIN JACKSON from the Yanks for Santana. I figured the Twins asking price would have been MUCH higher than that. Having said that... I could see us put together a package of PIE/HILL/SMARDJA/PATTERSON for him but it would deplete our team so much to do this that I am unsure of the benefits.

  • Barry

    Gentlemen,

    I apologize for the multiple posts but things have been boring with our lack of Winter dealings. I am curious, does anyone believe that we can put a package together to Trade for Santana and then give him the six years he is seeking? I mean we are talking about the best and most consistent SP in the League.



    We have arms and position players to give and our pay-role grew sustanitally. One could summize that it will continue to grow as we get deeper into the playoffs and or win the Series.



    What say you????

  • daverj

    Please not GR! Anyone but GR!!!

  • "Uncle Gerry"

    Good news re Woody!! If your name from the past happens to be a left-handed middle reliever with the initials G.R. please give me some warning so I won't barf all over my keyboard when I see it.

  • cliff

    After thinking about it for a few minutes... I have to give a big thanks to KERRY WOOD. He stayed very loyal to the Cubs when there were rumors of many playoff caliber teams pursuing him with more money and more years. Back end of our bullpen is not set in my opinion... Howry, Marmol, Wood could resemble the Lidge, Dotel, Wagner three-some Houston had a few years ago.



    THANK YOU KERRY WOOD!!!

  • nick

    (Big sigh of relief) Thank you very much Hendry, Good Job!!! Now go get us a power hitting rightfielder!!

  • Barry

    Hey Ryan, great job dude, you beat me by three minutes!! lol Apparantly you and I read and reacted at the exact same moments but I was asked a question by a peer before I sent so I will take the credit!!! JK





    Seriously though CUBS Fans, this is a critical signing for us. Jim has been saying all the while that he thought something could get done. This further demonstartes, in my mind at least, that Jim Hendry is a guy players trust. We've heard it time and time again how comfortable players felt playing for our organization and the mutual respect players and management had for one another. Sounds like a love fest I know but in the hend it gives our club legitimacy to free agents looking not only for a competitive contract but a storied franchise w/integrity!!!



    Next, Matsui then Fukudome and who knows, can we make a run at Santana??

  • cliff

    Rotoworld is reporting that ESPN 1000 is reporting the same thing about Wood-y.



    Thank you Wood-y for remaining loyal and thank you JH for making it happen.

  • Barry

    I just read on MLBTRADERUMORS.COM we signed Kerry!!! I yr w/incentives!!! Way to go JIM!!!!

  • Ryan

    WE SIGNED WOOD! I am happy we signed him they are saying one year at 4m dollars...mlbtraderumors.com

  • daverj

    Neil, I hope I'm wrong, but ... Luis Gonzales? A Gonzales/Murton platoon might be relatively productive but that's not what I had in mind to solve our OF problems.

  • Neil

    Adam...nope.

  • Adam in Iowa

    Corey Patterson?

  • Neil

    Matt....nope, guess again. And I will let you know where you can send the $20 dollars....

  • Matt Haggard

    20 dollars says the "name" is Sammy. Come on now Neil. Haha



    I feel lonely without any real baseball guys. Is the winter league mlb.tv package worth buying? Who would I root for?

  • Scott McMeekan

    Happy Cyber-Monday CCO'ers. I've been enjoying reading the posts for the past couple of weeks, and have been anxiously waiting for whatever moves Hendry is going to make.



    I'm amazed at the amount of insight (and the time necessary to communicate that insight) that many of the posters display. Aaron, Jim (TP), augustin, and of course Neil....kudos to your ability to break things down.



    Let me just say something about Woody. I have loved him from the moment he took the mound against the 'Stros that day. Many of the reports I'm reading this morning are saying that it is now a long-shot that Wood stays a cub. I'm saddened by that, but since I own a business myself, I tried to put myself in Hendry's shoes and think like a future owner might....since I would think that the leading bidder might be having some input right now, albeit off the record.



    Wood was great in his 22 appearances last year...the stats will bear that out. The window for signing Wood back to the Cubs closed a long time ago, in my opinion. Now, possibly his agent has been playing this thing all along....waiting to see what the market would look like. It certainly would not have hurt Wood to wait and see, and now it appears that it will help him immensely.



    If I was Hendry, and I knew all the particulars about his arm ailments, and especially how he just miraculously didn't have anymore pain one day....i would be highly cautious. Sure, the Cubs have invested a ton of money and even more patience with Woody. However, anything other than an incentive based one or MAYBE two year deal would make good business sense. What if he develops that pain again in ST next year? He's likely done, that's what. And the Cubs would have lost an opportunity to look at another late setup guy for Marmol, who is the likely closer next year.



    I haven't done a lot of examining to see who might be out there to fill that role, I admit that. And I would love to see Kerry back in blue pinstripes. But unless he has a severe case of loyalty and likes the challenge of proving everyone wrong by signing an incentive laden deal, he's gone.



    If Hendry actually could have signed him a long time ago and just bonked....then as Aaron said, he truly is an idiot. If not...if Kerry and his agent have been wisely playing the market to see what might happen and wouldn't sign until late in the game....then I can't blame Hendry for not signing him. It's just too much of a gamble, in my opinion.



    Talk to you all later, hope you had a great Thanksgiving!



    Scott

blog comments powered by Disqus







CCO Twitter Updates




Shop WrigleyvilleSports.com Today!


Twitter Sports

Cubs on Twitter

Displaying tweets tagged with #Cubs

via twitter sports net


Recent Comments


Chicago Cubs Online - Featured On The Web Here

Chicago Cubs Online - one of Chicago's best blogs
Chicago Cubs Online - on Chicago Sun Times Chicago Cubs Online - on Sports Illustrated

ChicagoCubsOnline on YouTube